Skip to main content

Security report for daugmales.lv

Daugmales · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daugmales is a small hospitality and outdoor recreation business based in Latvia, specializing in camping accommodations, boat and SUP board rentals, sauna and hot tub facilities, and organized rafting trips on the Daugava river. The website targets tourists and outdoor enthusiasts seeking active nature experiences. Technically, the site is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery, and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile-optimized with a good user experience and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and visible anti-CSRF protections on forms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve privacy transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching daugmales.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector focusing on outdoor and water-based recreational services. Its market position appears local or regional within Latvia, catering to tourists and nature lovers. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue from rentals and accommodation. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing customer engagement. The website content is consistent and well-branded, supporting trust. However, lack of visible contact emails and phone numbers on the site may limit direct customer communication. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The business appears small in size with no public information on founding year or corporate structure.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. The login and registration forms do not show anti-CSRF tokens or CAPTCHA, potentially exposing the site to automated attacks or CSRF vulnerabilities. No published security policy or incident response contacts were found, which is a gap in security governance. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels introduces moderate user tracking, requiring clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved with standard web security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens and CAPTCHA to login and registration forms to prevent automated abuse and cross-site request forgery.
  3. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including a security@ or abuse@ email address and an incident response policy.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and user tracking to build trust with visitors and comply with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daugmales
Description
Daugmales offers camping by the Daugava river, boat and SUP board rentals, sauna, hot tub, and organizes boat trips including two-day canoeing tours on the Daugava river.
Key services
Camping accommodations, Boat and SUP board rentals, Raft trips, Sauna and hot tub facilities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  4. No explicit privacy policy page found, only basic cookie and terms links.
  5. Login form present but lacks visible advanced security controls.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly visible in HTML content.
  9. Website uses Mozello CMS and Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but basic technology stack centered on Mozello CMS, jQuery, and several JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, which supports good performance and availability. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and marketing, indicating digital maturity in user tracking and campaign management. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and canonical URLs. However, the lack of advanced security headers and limited accessibility features suggest room for technical improvement. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with daugmales.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review daugmales.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.