Skip to main content

Security report for datika.lv

Datika · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Datika is a Latvian company specializing in security alarm systems, video surveillance, electrical installation works, and IT infrastructure maintenance. The company targets businesses and individuals seeking professional security and electrical services. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client testimonials, indicating a solid local market presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, using modern libraries such as Bootstrap and jQuery, and includes Google reCAPTCHA for form security. SEO and mobile optimization are well implemented, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and trustworthy with room for security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching datika.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Datika operates as a service provider in the energy and technology sectors, focusing on security systems, video surveillance, and electrical installations. The business model revolves around providing installation, maintenance, and consulting services to local clients. The presence of client testimonials and active social media channels suggests a customer-focused approach and positive reputation. The company leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Ads and Analytics to reach and analyze its audience. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The website content and structure support a small-sized enterprise with a clear market niche in Latvia.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from automated abuse. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policies are not publicly documented, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but can benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Datika
Description
Apsardzes signalizācijas sistēmas - Videonovērošana
Key services
IT infrastruktūras uzturēšana un remonts, Elektroauto uzlādes stacijas, Videonovērošanas sistēmas, Ugunsgrēka atklāšanas un izziņošanas sistēmas, Apsardzes signalizācijas sistēmas, Elektromontāžas darbi, Piekļuves un darba laika uzskaites sistēmas, Projektēšana, dokumentācija, mērījumi, Filmēšana un video montāža
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, WooCommerce 9.8.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap CSS/JS, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company emails and phone numbers.
  5. Security headers are missing; HTTPS is enforced.
  6. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented for form protection.
  7. Multiple external tracking and advertising scripts from Google are used.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Business operates in security and electrical services sector in Latvia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile-friendly and SEO optimized with Yoast SEO plugin. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. However, the absence of some security headers and limited accessibility features indicate areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with datika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review datika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.