Skip to main content

Security report for datgeldtvoormij.nl

Dat geldt voor mij · Energy · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dat Geldt voor Mij is a Dutch information and comparison platform focused on helping users discover applicable financial allowances and whether they should switch energy suppliers or health insurance providers. The website targets Dutch residents seeking to optimize their financial benefits and service providers. The business operates in the energy and healthcare sectors, with a small company size and a domain registered in 2021. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, leveraging modern libraries such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for tracking and consent management. The site demonstrates good SEO practices and mobile optimization but lacks explicit privacy and security policy pages. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though additional security headers and incident response information are recommended. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with moderate user tracking and basic privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching datgeldtvoormij.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche player in the Dutch market, providing valuable financial and utility service comparisons. Its competitive advantage lies in localized content and integration with trusted data sources. The business model likely relies on affiliate or referral partnerships with energy and insurance providers, though no explicit affiliate programs were detected. The target customers are Dutch consumers interested in financial optimization. Growth potential exists through expanding service comparisons and enhancing user engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes social media presence on Instagram and LinkedIn, supporting brand visibility. Strategic observations suggest the company should formalize privacy and security policies to strengthen trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. Cookie consent is managed dynamically via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot requires ongoing monitoring for security risks. Recommendations include adding security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and publishing a security policy page to enhance transparency and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to harden security posture.
  3. Add an incident response page with clear contact channels for security issues and abuse reports.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide detailed data retention policies to align with best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dat geldt voor mij
Description
Ontdek voor welke toeslagen en regelingen jij in aanmerking komt. En of je beter kunt overstappen van energieleverancier of zorgverzekeraar.
Key services
Information on allowances and regulations, Comparison of energy suppliers, Comparison of health insurance providers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, FontAwesome, Select2, Rank Math SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with dynamic data redaction
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Dutch and targets Dutch users
  2. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  5. No direct contact information or forms detected in provided content
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Select2, FontAwesome, and Google Tag Manager. It uses Rank Math SEO plugin for search engine optimization and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by team.blue nl B.V., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with prefetching scripts and CDN usage for fonts and libraries. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for rich snippets, enhancing SEO. Technical risks are low but could be further reduced by updating security headers and monitoring third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with datgeldtvoormij.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review datgeldtvoormij.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.