Skip to main content

Security report for datatrans.ch

Datatrans AG · Finance · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Datatrans AG is a Swiss-based company specializing in advanced payment solutions tailored for companies demanding high-performance and flexible payment platforms. Their service model emphasizes integration freedom with various financial partners, positioning them as a key player in the payment processing sector within Switzerland and potentially neighboring regions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting business clients seeking reliable payment infrastructure. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Ahrefs, and uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with good performance metrics and accessibility features. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses CSRF protection cookies, and provides a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though it lacks explicit security policy or incident response pages. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration with the business claims. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good privacy compliance and security posture, suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching datatrans.ch

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Datatrans operates in the finance and technology sectors, offering payment platform services that allow clients to customize and select financial partners. Their business model likely includes revenue from payment processing fees and platform licensing. The target market is medium to large enterprises requiring robust payment solutions. The company maintains partnerships with related domains for onboarding, documentation, and payment processing, indicating a well-structured ecosystem. The absence of public contact details on the homepage suggests a focus on B2B clients who engage through other channels. The company’s digital footprint and use of advanced analytics tools indicate a data-driven approach to market positioning and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection mechanisms in place. The use of Cookiebot ensures GDPR-compliant cookie management with explicit user consent. However, the absence of visible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure pages represents a gap in transparency and readiness. Security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, which could be improved to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The overall security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized security documentation and enhanced HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Datatrans AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Datatrans AG
Description
Datatrans provides a flexible payment platform with custom features and freedom to choose any financial partner, targeting companies demanding advanced payment solutions.
Key services
Payment processing, Custom payment platform features, Integration with financial partners
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Ahrefs Analytics
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • CSRF token cookie present (csrftoken)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Ahrefs Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie declaration
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML
  3. No visible terms of service or security policy pages
  4. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with privacy compliance
  5. Strong branding and consistent professional presentation
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily Vue.js, with asynchronous loading of CSS and JavaScript assets to optimize performance. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Ahrefs Analytics, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices, including proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the presence of Cloudflare-like assets is not detected, suggesting direct or alternative hosting. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with datatrans.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review datatrans.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.