Skip to main content

Security report for datainvision.com

Data Invision · Finance · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Data Invision is a technology startup founded in 2019, specializing in AI-powered predictive analytics solutions primarily for the finance sector. Their platform focuses on enhancing business decision-making through machine learning models that address credit risk, fraud detection, and campaign optimization. The company positions itself as a niche provider offering precision, efficiency, and profitability improvements to financial institutions and related businesses. Technically, the website is built with modern JavaScript frameworks such as React and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is enforced and domain registration is protected against unauthorized changes, the site lacks security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Contact information is limited to a company email and a hidden contact form, with no phone numbers or physical addresses found. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and privacy compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching datainvision.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Data Invision operates in the finance and technology sectors, targeting financial institutions and businesses requiring advanced risk analytics. Their business model is B2B SaaS, delivering AI-driven predictive models to optimize credit limits, detect identity fraud, and improve campaign effectiveness. The company benefits from participation in a FinTech acceleration program, enhancing its credibility. Their competitive advantage lies in automating model creation and deployment, reducing time-to-market for predictive analytics. The company maintains an active social media presence, supporting marketing and customer engagement. Growth indicators include a relatively recent domain registration consistent with the startup's founding year and a focused product offering. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration status flags provide protection against unauthorized domain changes. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or security policies are publicly available, which may impact organizational readiness. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Analytics and Tag Manager, which require regular auditing to avoid vulnerabilities. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. GDPR compliance is partial due to the lack of a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small startup but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to demonstrate organizational readiness.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Data Invision
Description
Data Invision provides AI and machine learning powered predictive analytics solutions to boost business decision-making, focusing on risk management such as probability of default, credit limits, identity fraud, and campaign optimization.
Key services
Probability of default modeling, Credit limit optimization, Identity fraud detection, Campaign channels and timing optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited etc.

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus on AI-driven risk analytics
  3. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found, which may impact GDPR compliance
  4. Security headers are not detected, representing an area for improvement
  5. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is not privacy protected, supporting legitimacy
  6. Social media presence across LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram supports trust
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking
  8. Contact information includes a hidden contact form and a company email address
  9. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the content
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack, likely React, with asynchronous loading of Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags found. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site uses a custom CMS or framework rather than popular CMS platforms. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which could be addressed to improve resilience. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with datainvision.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review datainvision.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.