Skip to main content

Security report for datacenterpowerexchange.com

Access Intelligence, LLC. · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Experience Power operates the Data Center POWER eXchange (DPX), a specialized forum addressing the energy challenges posed by the rapid growth of AI, hyperscale data centers, and cloud computing. The event targets utilities, data center operators, policymakers, and investors, providing a platform for discussing grid integration, sustainability, and power generation solutions. The website is professionally designed, leveraging WordPress and modern web technologies, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and data collection. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented in compliance with GDPR standards. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and age, warranting further verification. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS and monitoring tools but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching datacenterpowerexchange.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche event organizer in the energy and digital infrastructure sectors, focusing on the intersection of power and data center growth. Its business model revolves around hosting industry summits, facilitating networking, and providing sponsorship opportunities. The presence of reputable partners and sponsors such as 247 Mesa and Wartsila enhances its market credibility. The target audience includes utilities, grid operators, data center developers, policymakers, and investors, indicating a B2B focus. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile under Access Intelligence, LLC. The lack of detailed company founding information and domain registration data suggests a need for enhanced transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and integrates security monitoring via New Relic. It features a comprehensive cookie consent banner powered by Osano, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly present in the analyzed data, and no dedicated security or incident response pages are found. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by publishing security policies, incident response contacts, and enhancing HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly document explicit security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency to build trust and verify legitimacy.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and more comprehensive business information to improve credibility and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Access Intelligence, LLC.
Description
Data Center POWER eXchange (DPX) is a forum bringing together utilities, data center operators, policymakers, and investors to address energy challenges from AI, hyperscale data centers, and cloud computing expansion. It focuses on grid integration, power generation, sustainability, and digital infrastructure growth.
Key services
Industry forums and summits, Networking and knowledge sharing, Sponsorship and partnership opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API, Osano Consent Management, Intercom chat widget, New Relic monitoring, Bootstrap CSS, Slick Carousel, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Privacy policy linked
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic, Omeda Olytics, Feathr
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
New Relic, Feathr, Omeda Olytics
Marketing tools
Intercom, Osano Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on a specialized industry event related to energy and data centers.
  3. Professional design and consistent branding observed.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  6. Multiple third-party scripts and tracking tools are used for analytics and marketing.
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  8. Contact information is provided via emails only; no phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  9. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing modern front-end libraries and frameworks including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Slick Carousel. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, New Relic, Omeda Olytics, Feathr, Intercom, and Osano for consent management. The site loads asynchronously and uses CDN resources for fonts and scripts, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are good, with responsive design and ARIA roles present. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and some security headers are missing or not visible in the source. Overall, the technical infrastructure is mature but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with datacenterpowerexchange.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review datacenterpowerexchange.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.