Skip to main content

Security report for darkpornlist.com

Dark Porn List · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dark Porn List is a niche adult content listing website founded in 2020, specializing in curating and linking to extreme and rare pornographic sites featuring highly explicit and controversial content. The site targets an adults-only audience interested in extreme adult entertainment. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, utilizing common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Masonry for layout, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting and DNS services are provided via Cloudflare, ensuring good SSL configuration but lacking DNSSEC. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing critical security headers and privacy policies, which impacts compliance and trust. The site lacks direct contact emails or phone numbers, relying solely on a contact form for communication. Overall, the website presents basic design and navigation with moderate performance and limited mobile optimization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching darkpornlist.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as an affiliate/listing platform within the adult entertainment media sector, focusing on a highly specialized niche of extreme adult content. Its market position is that of a niche leader for extreme porn listings, catering to a mature audience seeking rare and explicit content. The business model revolves around providing curated links and screenshots to external adult sites, potentially generating revenue through affiliate or referral mechanisms, although no explicit affiliate programs are disclosed. The site encourages webmasters to submit high-quality extreme content sites for listing, indicating an intent to maintain content quality. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as limited contact information, suggests a small-scale operation with minimal formal business infrastructure.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is properly implemented, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to common web vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The site uses third-party tracking scripts extensively, increasing privacy risks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security incidents. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  4. Provide direct contact emails for support and security incident reporting.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dark Porn List
Description
A curated listing website focusing on extreme and rare adult pornographic sites featuring extreme content such as rape, death, gore, scat, and other explicit material.
Key services
Curated listings of extreme pornographic websites, Providing screenshots and links to listed sites, Contact platform for webmasters to submit sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Masonry.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche adult content listing site focusing on extreme and rare pornographic content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating poor compliance posture.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and Google analytics/tracking scripts.
  4. No security headers detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; only a contact form is available.
  6. Content is explicit adult material with no age verification or warnings visible.
  7. External links point to various extreme adult content domains.
  8. No visible advertising networks or affiliate disclosures.
  9. Site performance and mobile optimization are basic but functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a widely used CMS (WordPress 6.7.2) with standard JavaScript libraries for UI layout and Google services for analytics and tag management. Hosting and DNS are managed through Cloudflare, providing good SSL/TLS configuration but lacking DNSSEC. The site has moderate performance with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms, which are critical technical debts. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or platforms beyond WordPress and common JS libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could be modernized and hardened to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with darkpornlist.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review darkpornlist.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.