Skip to main content

Security report for darcovskasms.cz

Fórum dárců / Czech Donors Forum · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.darcovskasms.cz represents a well-established non-profit platform facilitating charitable donations via SMS in the Czech Republic. It is a joint project of the Czech Donors Forum and major Czech mobile operators, supported by the government. The platform offers both one-time and recurring donation options, targeting donors and NGOs. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content, supporting multiple donation categories and projects. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome icons. It employs HTTPS with Google Analytics for minimal user tracking and includes a cookie consent mechanism. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and some security best practices like security headers are missing. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent for privacy compliance but lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages. No WHOIS data is available, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration standpoint. No visible vulnerabilities or security incidents are detected, but improvements in security headers and disclosure policies are recommended. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and serves its charitable mission effectively, but it would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices to improve compliance and trust further.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of darcovskasms.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching darcovskasms.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche in the charitable donation sector in the Czech Republic, leveraging partnerships with leading mobile operators and government support to facilitate SMS donations. Its business model is donation facilitation with no direct commercial revenue, focusing on NGOs and donors. The presence of multiple donation categories and project listings indicates a broad target audience within the non-profit sector. The partnership ecosystem is strong, including major telecom providers and government entities, enhancing credibility and reach. Growth indicators include the introduction of new donation price points and ongoing innovation. The platform's operations appear stable and professionally managed, with a clear focus on transparency and user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No privacy policy or terms of service pages are found, which is a compliance concern under GDPR. The lack of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. Data protection officer contact is not provided. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the site's purpose but requires enhancements in policy transparency, header implementation, and domain registration clarity to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure process to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fórum dárců / Czech Donors Forum
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fórum dárců / Czech Donors Forum
Description
Společný projekt Fóra dárců a českých mobilních operátorů, umožňující zasílání dárcovských SMS ve výši 30, 60, 90 nebo 190 Kč jednorázově či trvale na podporu neziskových projektů.
Key services
Jednorázová DMS (one-time donation SMS), Trvalá DMS (recurring donation SMS), Project listings for donation, Information and support for NGOs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Slick Carousel, Google Fonts (Roboto), Font Awesome, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in for analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and clear navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with opt-in for analytics.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  8. No visible security or vulnerability disclosures.
  9. Partners include major Czech mobile operators and government entities.
  10. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and jQuery UI for UI components, Slick Carousel for sliders, Google Fonts for typography, and Font Awesome for icons. Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js with consent management. The site is responsive and mobile-optimized with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. The site lacks modern security headers and advanced accessibility features. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 46/100High35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with darcovskasms.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review darcovskasms.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.