Skip to main content

Security report for darcovskasms.cz

Fórum dárců | Czech Donors Forum · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.darcovskasms.cz operates as a charitable SMS donation platform managed by the Czech Donors Forum, a non-profit organization. It facilitates one-time and recurring donations via SMS to various social and humanitarian projects in the Czech Republic. The platform is supported by major Czech mobile operators and government entities, indicating a strong market position within the charitable sector. The site provides clear information on donation methods, project categories, and partner organizations, targeting the general public interested in supporting non-profit causes. Technically, the website employs common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel, uses HTTPS, and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. However, it lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, and no advanced security headers were detected, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trustworthiness and raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be enhanced to improve security transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its non-profit mission effectively. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms policies, enhancing security headers, verifying domain registration details, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to strengthen security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching darcovskasms.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform is positioned as a key facilitator of charitable donations via SMS in the Czech Republic, leveraging partnerships with major telecom operators and government support. Its business model focuses on enabling easy, accessible donations to a wide range of social projects. The presence of multiple donation tiers and recurring donation options indicates a mature service offering. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable organizations, enhancing credibility. Growth potential lies in expanding project listings and increasing donor engagement. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and benefits to donors and NGOs alike.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security governance. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed through cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by addressing these gaps.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked in the website footer.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user and donor rights and obligations.
  4. Establish and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to enhance trust and legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Czech Donors Forum
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fórum dárců | Czech Donors Forum
Description
Společný projekt Fóra dárců a českých mobilních operátorů. Po třinácti letech od svého vzniku přichází s inovací. Pošlete 30, ale také 60 nebo 90 Kč. Jednorázově či trvale.
Key services
Jednorázová DMS (one-time SMS donations), Trvalá DMS (recurring SMS donations), Project listings for donation, Information and support for NGOs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Slick Carousel, Google Fonts (Roboto), Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in for statistical cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about charitable SMS donations.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with clear user options.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Multiple trusted partners and government support indicated.
  9. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with jQuery, jQuery UI, and Slick Carousel for UI components, along with Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating secure transport. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are properly implemented. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism with granular controls, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 46/100High35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with darcovskasms.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review darcovskasms.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.