Skip to main content

Security report for danvojtech.cz

Dan Vojtěch · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dan Vojtěch is a professional photographer based in Prague, Czech Republic, specializing in action sports, lifestyle, commercial, automotive photography, and video production. The website showcases a comprehensive portfolio with notable brand associations including Red Bull, Nikon, and Maxim, positioning the business as a niche player in the media and photography sector. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with common plugins such as WPML for multilingual support and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional content presentation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but lacking explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact phone numbers and physical addresses, represents compliance and trust gaps. Overall, the website is legitimate and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danvojtech.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small, service-based professional photography entity targeting clients in sports, lifestyle, and commercial sectors. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized portfolio and official partnerships such as with Red Bull. The business model focuses on direct client services and brand collaborations. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and extensive portfolio galleries. However, the lack of formal privacy and cookie policies and limited contact information may impact trust and regulatory compliance. The partnership with web design firm Kutululu indicates a professional support ecosystem. Growth indicators include a broad portfolio and international client base, but no explicit revenue or size data is available.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The use of common WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a portfolio site but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Consider adding a contact phone number and physical address to enhance business credibility.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dan Vojtěch
Description
Professional photographer based in Prague, Czech Republic, specializing in action sports, lifestyle, commercials, and automotive photography. Official Red Bull photographer with a portfolio including work for Maxim, Red Bull, Nikon, and other brands.
Key services
Action sports photography, Lifestyle photography, Commercial photography, Automotive photography, Video production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin), Antiscroll, Magnific Popup
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected to collect user input

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional photography portfolio for Dan Vojtěch.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses found; only email and social media contacts.
  5. No forms present on the website, reducing attack surface but limiting user interaction.
  6. Use of WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking with no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL usage implied but not confirmed.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a technology stack including jQuery, WPML for multilingual support, Antiscroll for custom scrollbars, and Magnific Popup for image galleries. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses modern JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate, with some custom scripts for UI interactions. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD detected. Hosting provider details are not available. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danvojtech.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danvojtech.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.