Skip to main content

Security report for danskebanka.lv

Danske Bank A/S Lithuania branch · Finance · Lithuania

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Danske Bank A/S Lithuania branch operates as a financial institution providing banking-related services and customer support, although it explicitly states it does not provide banking services in Lithuania directly. The website serves as a contact portal offering press contacts, support for former customers, and general inquiries. The bank is a branch of the well-established Danske Bank A/S, a major Nordic banking group, with a domain registered since 2006, indicating a mature online presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, jQuery, and Adobe Dynamic Tag Management for analytics and tracking. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes accessibility features. Hosting and DNS services are managed by reputable providers, and the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration, ensuring secure communications. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular user options. However, explicit security headers are not evident, and no dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page is published. The presence of a Data Protection Officer contact aligns with GDPR compliance requirements. No security blocking or WAF challenges were detected, and no vulnerabilities were found in the visible content. Overall, the website reflects a professional, trustworthy banking institution with strong privacy and security awareness. Strategic improvements could include publishing a dedicated security policy, implementing additional security headers, and providing a vulnerability disclosure channel to enhance transparency and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danskebanka.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Danske Bank Lithuania branch is positioned as a regional branch of a large Nordic banking group, targeting former customers, press, and general inquiries. The business model focuses on banking services and customer support, leveraging the reputation and infrastructure of its parent company. The website content and domain age support a stable market presence. The bank maintains active social media channels and provides clear contact points, enhancing customer engagement and trust. There is no indication of subsidiaries or complex partnerships on this site. The business operates in the finance sector with a large enterprise scale, supported by regulatory authorization from the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is good, with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner that complies with GDPR. The site avoids exposing sensitive data and uses modern tracking tools responsibly. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Incident response contact is limited to the Data Protection Officer email, with no dedicated security or abuse contacts. Overall, the site is secure but could improve in formalizing and publishing security policies and response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and maintain a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance measures.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Expand incident response contacts to include security@ or abuse@ email addresses for faster handling of security incidents.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerable or deprecated libraries are used.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Danske Bank A/S Lithuania branch
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danske Bank A/S Lithuania branch
Description
Danske Bank Lithuania branch provides banking services and customer support, although it notes it does not provide banking services in Lithuania directly. It offers press contacts, former customer support, and other inquiries contact points.
Key services
Customer support, Press relations, General inquiries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Adobe DTM (Adobe Dynamic Tag Management), Ultradns (DNS), SVG icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe DTM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe DTM
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear contact information with multiple verified company emails.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with granular options.
  4. No security blocking or WAF challenges detected.
  5. Social media presence on major platforms with official accounts.
  6. No explicit security policy or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  7. Data Protection Officer contact is provided.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with JavaScript, jQuery, and Adobe DTM for analytics and tag management. The DNS is managed by Ultradns, and the domain registrar is INWX GmbH. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The CMS is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. The site uses SVG icons extensively for UI elements, indicating a modern front-end design approach. There is room for improvement in security headers and formal security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danskebanka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danskebanka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.