Skip to main content

Security report for dailytelegraph.com.au

Daily Telegraph | Breaking News and Headlines from Sydney and News South Wales | Daily Telegraph · Media · Australia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Daily Telegraph is a prominent Australian news media outlet providing breaking news and headlines primarily focused on Sydney and New South Wales. The website offers digital newspaper editions, subscription services, and a broad range of news categories including local, national, business, entertainment, and sports. It operates under the News Corp Australia umbrella, reflecting a large-scale media presence with a consistent brand identity and professional content quality. The target audience is general, encompassing readers interested in current events and regional news. Technically, the site leverages a modern technology stack including WordPress CMS, various JavaScript libraries, and multiple third-party analytics and advertising services. The infrastructure supports desktop and mobile platforms with good performance and SEO optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are not evident in the provided content. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical and justified for a media company, and no suspicious domain registration patterns were detected. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with extensive content and advertising integration, suitable for a large media enterprise.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dailytelegraph.com.au

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Daily Telegraph holds a significant market position as a major regional news publisher in Australia, serving a large and diverse audience. Its business model centers on digital content publishing, subscription revenue, and advertising partnerships. The site integrates affiliate programs and rewards partnerships, enhancing monetization streams. The presence of multiple content categories and localized editions indicates a broad editorial scope and regional market penetration. The company benefits from the backing of News Corp Australia, providing scale and resources. Strategic partnerships with travel, sports tipping, and rewards platforms diversify its offerings and user engagement. Growth indicators include extensive use of analytics and marketing tools, suggesting active audience targeting and content optimization. The business ecosystem is robust, with a clear focus on digital transformation and audience retention.

Security posture

The Daily Telegraph exhibits a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS usage and implementation of key security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security and Referrer-Policy. The site avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML and uses modern JavaScript libraries without known vulnerabilities. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as a security.txt file or incident response contact information, indicates gaps in transparency and compliance readiness. The extensive use of third-party advertising and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks, necessitating vigilant monitoring and policy enforcement. No immediate vulnerabilities or security incidents are evident from the content analysis. The site would benefit from enhanced security disclosures and improved user privacy controls to align with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive and easily accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  3. Enhance Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate risks from third-party scripts.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and broaden audience reach.
  5. Increase transparency around data collection, retention, and user consent mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daily Telegraph | Breaking News and Headlines from Sydney and News South Wales | Daily Telegraph
Description
News and Breaking News Headlines Online including Latest News from Australia and the World. Read more News Headlines and Breaking News Stories at DailyTelegraph
Key services
news publishing, digital newspaper editions, subscriptions, advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, AMP, Google Tag Manager, Prebid.js, DoubleClick, Amazon A9, Outbrain, Vidora, Nielsen, Bing Ads, Crazy Egg, Optimizely, Chartbeat
Frameworks
WordPress (implied by wp-content paths), Newscorpau News DNA theme
Platforms
Desktop, Mobile (responsive design)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Nielsen, Chartbeat, Crazy Egg, Ipsos, Optimizely
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Amazon A9, Bing Ads, Outbrain, Ad Lightning
Tracking pixels
Nielsen, Reddit Pixel, Ipsos, Crazy Egg, Chartbeat, Optimizely
Marketing tools
Vidora
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a major Australian news media outlet with extensive content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS registrant details due to privacy protection
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy links found in provided HTML snippet
  4. Extensive use of third-party advertising and analytics scripts
  5. Good HTTPS and security header usage but could improve transparency on privacy and security policies
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform customized with the Newscorpau News DNA theme, leveraging a wide array of JavaScript libraries and third-party services for advertising, analytics, and user engagement. The infrastructure includes CDN usage likely via Akamai or News Corp's own resources, supporting fast content delivery. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of fonts and stylesheets. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and mobile-friendly meta tags. Technical debt appears low, but reliance on numerous third-party scripts could pose maintenance and security challenges. Opportunities exist to streamline scripts and enhance privacy compliance through technical controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dailytelegraph.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dailytelegraph.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.