Skip to main content

Security report for dailymail.co.uk

Daily Mail · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daily Mail Online is a major UK-based media publisher providing breaking news, entertainment, sports, and viral content. The website targets a broad general audience with a business model primarily based on advertising revenue. The site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good SEO practices and consistent branding. Technically, it employs modern advertising and analytics technologies including Google Tag Manager and multiple ad networks, though mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and Content-Security-Policy headers, but could be enhanced with additional headers and secure cookie practices. Privacy compliance is weak due to lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies in the analyzed content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to querying a subdomain rather than the base domain, but the brand's legitimacy is well established. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but should improve privacy transparency and security headers to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dailymail.co.uk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dailymail.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Daily Mail Online holds a strong market position as a leading UK news publisher with extensive reach and brand recognition. Its competitive advantage lies in comprehensive news coverage and a wide range of content types appealing to a general audience. Revenue streams are primarily advertising-based, leveraging multiple ad networks and tracking technologies. The company likely operates at an enterprise scale given its extensive content and technology footprint. The partnership ecosystem includes major ad and analytics providers. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and mobile user experience to maintain market leadership amid increasing regulatory scrutiny.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and a Content-Security-Policy header to block mixed content, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, other important security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. The extensive use of third-party advertising and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly evident, suggesting potential gaps in transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and improving privacy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to provide a better user experience across devices and comply with accessibility standards.
  4. Establish and publish clear incident response and security policy information to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daily Mail
Description
MailOnline - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from MailOnline, Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Key services
news publishing, showbiz coverage, sports news, viral videos, opinion and analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, DoubleClick, Rubicon Project, Flashtalking, Video.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied via GTM)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick, Rubicon Project, Flashtalking, Teads, Google Ad Services
Tracking pixels
DoubleVerify, Google Analytics (implied), Google Ad Services
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected
  2. WHOIS lookup failed due to querying subdomain instead of base domain
  3. Site uses extensive advertising and tracking technologies
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in provided HTML snippet
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided content
  6. Strong brand presence and consistent design
  7. Good SEO and meta tag usage
  8. Security headers partially implemented, room for improvement
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern advertising and analytics technology stack including Google Tag Manager, DoubleClick, Rubicon Project, and Flashtalking. The presence of a Content-Security-Policy header indicates some attention to security. Performance is moderate with preconnect and preload hints for key resources. The site uses Video.js for media playback. However, no specific CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the provided content. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility and mobile optimization are basic, indicating room for technical improvements. The WHOIS lookup failure is due to querying the subdomain 'www.dailymail.co.uk' rather than the registered domain 'dailymail.co.uk', which is a technical detail to note for domain verification processes.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dailymail.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dailymail.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.