Skip to main content

Security report for dailybranding.co

Daily Branding · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daily Branding is a niche media platform providing daily branding design inspiration sourced from top designers and studios worldwide. The website targets design professionals, startups, and enthusiasts seeking creative logos, identities, and branding trends. It operates primarily as a content curation and inspiration hub within the media industry. The platform is built using Framer technology, indicating a modern but somewhat proprietary technical infrastructure. The site demonstrates good design quality and content relevance, with a focus on visual branding and daily featured projects. However, it lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and no direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which limits user trust and compliance transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no advanced security headers detected. The domain registration is privacy protected, which is common for small media sites but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dailybranding.co

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a daily source of branding inspiration, appealing to a specialized audience of design professionals and startups. Its business model revolves around content curation and community engagement via daily featured projects and email subscriptions. The presence of a sponsor (wegrow.design) indicates partnership-driven revenue or support. The platform leverages modern web technologies but does not expose detailed business or legal information, which is typical for small content-focused sites. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and improving user engagement through enhanced contact and compliance transparency. The partnership ecosystem includes design-related entities, enhancing credibility within the creative industry.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced as indicated by canonical URLs, but no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The site includes a subscription form collecting email addresses but lacks visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of direct contact emails for security or abuse reporting reduces incident response readiness. Overall, the site should improve its security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency to enhance its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently link a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear and direct contact information including security and abuse reporting emails to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and broaden audience reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daily Branding
Description
Explore Daily Branding for daily branding inspiration from top designers and studios worldwide. Discover creative logos, identities, and branding trends. A hub for design professionals, startups, and enthusiasts seeking innovative branding ideas.
Key services
daily branding inspiration, showcasing branding projects, branding trends discovery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Framer events script
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
events.framer.com
Marketing tools
Mailchimp (email subscription form)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed branding inspiration platform
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact available only via subscription form, no direct emails or phone numbers
  4. Uses Framer platform and hosting
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content
  7. Domain WHOIS is privacy protected, limiting registrant transparency
  8. External links mostly to trusted domains and partners
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards with extensive use of custom fonts and responsive design techniques. The site loads external scripts from Framer's event tracking service and integrates a Mailchimp subscription form for email collection. Hosting appears to be managed by Framer or a related provider, with no explicit hosting details available. Performance is moderate with large images optimized via srcset attributes. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is modern but somewhat proprietary, which may limit customization. No CMS other than Framer is detected. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dailybranding.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dailybranding.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.