Skip to main content

Security report for dagenmarked.no

Dagbladet Dagen As · Media · Norway

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dagen Marked operates as the advertising division of Dagbladet Dagen As, a prominent Norwegian Christian niche newspaper. The website showcases a professional and growing media business focused on delivering advertising solutions across digital, print, and audio channels. Their market position is strong within Norway's niche media landscape, supported by a growing subscriber base and a clear target audience of active churchgoers and digital consumers. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies and delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or domain registration opacity, but the professional presentation and contact information support legitimacy. Overall, the website is a credible and well-maintained digital presence for a medium-sized media business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dagenmarked.no

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a leading Christian niche media outlet in Norway, with a business model combining subscription revenue and diversified advertising products. Their competitive advantage lies in a highly engaged and unique audience, including a high percentage of active churchgoers and digital subscribers. The business leverages multiple advertising channels, including podcasts, digital ads, and print, to maximize reach and advertiser value. Growth indicators include a 71% increase in circulation since 2018 and a subscriber base of over 16,800. The partnership ecosystem includes podcast hosting via Ocast and email marketing through MailMojo. Strategic observations highlight the importance of digital transformation and maintaining trust with a niche audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. GDPR compliance is not clearly addressed, with no privacy or cookie policies found. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a media website but would benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dagbladet Dagen As
Description
Dagen Marked is the advertising and marketing arm of Dagen, a leading Norwegian Christian niche newspaper with a rapidly growing subscriber base. It offers advertising products across digital, print, and audio channels targeting a unique audience of active churchgoers and digital subscribers.
Key services
Digital advertising, Print advertising, Audio/podcast advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1, MailMojo SDK, Ocast podcast platform
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with anti-spam hidden field

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MailMojo, Ocast
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or domain registration issues
  4. Professional business presence with clear contact info and team details
  5. Uses modern web technologies and CMS (Webflow)
  6. No security headers detected, opportunity for improvement
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences
  9. Advertising offerings well described with multiple channels
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable performance and HTTPS support. The site includes embedded forms for email subscription using MailMojo, and podcast advertising links via Ocast. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Technical risks are low but could be further mitigated by adding security headers and improving privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dagenmarked.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dagenmarked.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.