Skip to main content

Security report for dag-dgess.de

event lab. GmbH · Healthcare · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website dag-dgess.de represents the joint annual congress of the German Obesity Society (DAG) and the German Society for Eating Disorders (DGESS) scheduled for October 2025 in Stuttgart. It serves as a professional platform for healthcare professionals, researchers, and affected individuals to engage in interdisciplinary exchange, scientific presentations, and workshops. The event is organized by event lab. GmbH, a specialized event organizer in the healthcare sector. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, clear branding, and comprehensive content relevant to its target audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme framework, enhanced with accessibility and cookie compliance plugins such as Borlabs Cookie and OneTap Pro. The hosting is managed via kasserver.com, and the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and sliders for rich content presentation. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and excellent accessibility features, ensuring compliance with modern web standards. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and cookie consent mechanisms. While some security headers are not explicitly detected, the overall posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, GDPR adherence, and transparent contact information. Overall, dag-dgess.de is a trustworthy, well-maintained website with a clear business purpose, strong compliance posture, and good user experience. There are no indications of malicious activity or content safety concerns. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, maintaining regular updates, and formalizing incident response documentation to further strengthen security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dag-dgess.de

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
60
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The DAG-DGESS congress website targets a niche healthcare segment focusing on obesity and eating disorders. Its market positioning is that of a specialized scientific event organizer, leveraging partnerships with academic and public health institutions. The business model revolves around event hosting, scientific program delivery, and networking facilitation. Revenue streams likely include registration fees, sponsorships, and exhibitor participation. The presence of early career scientist programs and patient experience highlights indicates a growth-oriented and inclusive approach. The partnership ecosystem includes event lab. GmbH and CleverReach for marketing. The website's clear structure and professional content reflect a mature operation with strong compliance and accessibility focus.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and cookie consent mechanisms. Accessibility and privacy plugins enhance compliance and user trust. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response plan, which are recommended for comprehensive security governance. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced header configurations and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Maintain up-to-date WordPress core, themes, and plugins to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  3. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing data retention policies and detailed privacy notices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
event lab. GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
event lab. GmbH
Description
Organisation of the joint annual congress of the German Obesity Society (DAG) and the German Society for Eating Disorders (DGESS) focusing on interdisciplinary exchange in obesity and eating disorders research, prevention, and therapy.
Key services
Congress organization, Scientific program hosting, Workshops and keynotes, Networking platform for healthcare professionals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, Borlabs Cookie plugin, Accessibility Plugin OneTap Pro
Frameworks
Avada theme framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Accessibility and privacy compliance plugins used

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CleverReach (email marketing)
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie, CleverReach
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on a scientific congress for obesity and eating disorders.
  3. Strong emphasis on accessibility and compliance with GDPR.
  4. Professional design and clear navigation structure.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and accessibility tools.
  6. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity.
  8. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, supported by popular plugins for sliders (LayerSlider, Slider Revolution), cookie management (Borlabs Cookie), and accessibility (OneTap Pro). The hosting provider is kasserver.com, indicated by the nameservers. The site uses jQuery and modern JavaScript for interactive elements. Performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and excellent accessibility features, including multiple modes for vision impairment and reading assistance. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The technical stack is well-chosen for a professional event site but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dag-dgess.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dag-dgess.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.