Skip to main content

Security report for daftsex.com

Brazzers · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Redtube's Brazzers channel is a leading adult entertainment platform offering a vast library of premium pornographic videos featuring top industry performers. The site is well-branded, with consistent design and user experience optimized for desktop and mobile users. It operates on an advertising-supported model with upsell options to premium subscriptions via partner sites. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, lazy loading, and ad networks to deliver content efficiently, though some security headers are not explicitly declared. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned policies. However, the absence of public WHOIS data and lack of direct company contact or security incident response information slightly reduce trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching daftsex.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Brazzers on Redtube holds a dominant market position in adult video streaming, evidenced by its top ranking and large subscriber base. The business model leverages free content to attract users while promoting premium subscriptions through affiliate partnerships. The site integrates multiple advertising networks and tracking tools to monetize traffic effectively. Its target audience is adult consumers seeking high-quality adult content. The partnership ecosystem includes Brazzers Network and live cam services, enhancing revenue streams and user engagement. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and extensive video catalog. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve transparency and security posture to strengthen brand trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, age verification modals, and cookie consent banners. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident in the HTML, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicates a gap in security transparency. Overall, the site maintains a good security baseline but should enhance header configurations and provide clearer security governance information to users.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly configure security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Consider publishing verified company contact information to strengthen business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and ad networks to minimize potential security and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brazzers
Description
BRAZZERS is a premium adult content channel offering a large library of original pornographic videos featuring top pornstars, updated daily with new HD scenes.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Premium subscription offers, Channel subscriptions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery 2.1.3, Google Tag Manager, HLS.js, TrafficJunky Ads, LazyLoad, Custom JS utilities
Platforms
PC, Tablet, Mobile
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification modal
  • Cookie consent banner with management options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficJunky, Adtng
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a mature adult content platform with a large user base and extensive video library.
  2. Content is accessible without WAF or security blocks.
  3. Strong use of advertising and tracking technologies.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct company contact information or security incident response details found.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or proxy registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a combination of custom JavaScript utilities, jQuery 2.1.3, HLS.js for video streaming, and integrates Google Tag Manager and TrafficJunky ad networks. Lazy loading is implemented for images to optimize performance. The platform supports multiple languages and device types, indicating a responsive design approach. While performance is moderate, there is room for improvement in accessibility and explicit security header implementation. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-traffic adult content site with standard monetization and tracking mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with daftsex.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review daftsex.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.