Skip to main content

Security report for czechinternetforum.cz

Internet Info, s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Czech Internet Forum website represents a well-established annual conference organized by Internet Info, s.r.o., focusing on trends and developments in the Czech online media and digital marketing sectors. The event targets professionals and stakeholders in media, marketing, and digital content creation, offering a platform for knowledge sharing and networking. The site content is rich, professionally presented, and includes detailed program schedules, speaker profiles, partner information, and registration options. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Sentry for error monitoring, and popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper, and Fancybox. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a cookie consent mechanism, although it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and integrates error tracking, but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and business presence appear legitimate. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation. Strategically, the site is a credible and professional platform for the Czech Internet Forum event, with strong branding and industry trust signals. Recommendations include publishing privacy and terms policies, implementing security headers, adding a security.txt file, and improving accessibility to strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching czechinternetforum.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Czech Internet Forum is positioned as a key annual event in the Czech media and digital marketing landscape, with a 20-year history. Its business model centers on event organization, ticket sales, and partnerships with media and technology companies. The conference attracts a professional audience interested in digital trends, marketing innovations, and media evolution. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable media companies and technology providers, enhancing its market credibility. The company Internet Info, s.r.o. acts as the organizer, leveraging its industry connections and expertise. Growth indicators include consistent event execution, high-profile speakers, and positive testimonials. The business benefits from a strong brand presence and a focused niche in the Czech Republic.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Sentry integration indicates proactive error monitoring. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts highlight areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but the missing privacy policy reduces compliance completeness. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and legal compliance.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Internet Info, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Internet Info, s.r.o.
Description
Organizes the annual Czech Internet Forum conference focusing on trends, experiences, and stories from the Czech online world, digital marketing, media, and internet evolution.
Key services
Annual conference organization, Media and marketing industry networking, Content and trend dissemination
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Sentry (error tracking), jQuery, Swiper.js, Fancybox, WebFont Loader, ClassyCountdown
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Teads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Sentry
Marketing tools
Sentry
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional conference site for Czech Internet Forum 2025.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and in Czech language.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  6. Multiple reputable partners and speakers listed.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. Contact info includes email and phone with clear context.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Sentry for error tracking, and popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Swiper, and Fancybox for UI components. Fonts are loaded asynchronously via Google Fonts with cookie-based consent tracking. The site is mobile responsive with a clean, professional design and structured content. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses canonical URLs and meta tags effectively for SEO. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional event website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with czechinternetforum.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review czechinternetforum.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.