Skip to main content

Security report for cytognos.com

Cytognos, S.L. · Healthcare · Spain

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cytognos, S.L. is a specialized healthcare company focused on providing clinical flow cytometry solutions, including reagents, devices, and software tailored for flow cytometer laboratories. The company leverages partnerships such as EuroFlow™ to offer advanced Next Generation Flow™ solutions, positioning itself as a niche provider in the clinical diagnostics sector. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional digital presence built on WordPress and WooCommerce, incorporating modern plugins and SEO optimizations. Technically, the site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service pages. The absence of public WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration transparency, but the website content and business information appear consistent and credible. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy disclosures and incident response readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cytognos.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cytognos.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
17
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
6
Weak passwords
29%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cytognos.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets clinical laboratories and healthcare professionals requiring flow cytometry solutions. Its business model is B2B, focusing on product lines such as antibodies, multicolor cocktails, ancillary reagents, and software tools for data analysis. The presence of an academy and events section indicates active engagement with the scientific community and ongoing education efforts. The partnership with EuroFlow™ and the use of branded solutions like Infinicyt™ and Next Generation Flow™ enhance its competitive advantage. Recruitment links to BD jobs suggest collaboration or affiliation with larger industry players. The company operates primarily in Spain, serving a specialized healthcare niche with a medium enterprise scale.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner, reflecting baseline security and privacy compliance efforts. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No contact information for security incidents or data protection officers is provided, limiting incident response transparency. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is evident, but privacy compliance could be enhanced by clearer disclosures. The lack of WHOIS data transparency is a concern but does not directly impact website security. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from improved policy documentation and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add a terms of service page detailing user agreements and legal disclaimers.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Provide clear company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cytognos, S.L.
Description
Cytognos, S.L. is a company dedicated to provide clinical flow cytometry solutions. We design, develop and provide reagents, devices and software to flow cytometer laboratories.
Key services
Reagents, Devices, Software, Next Generation Flow™ solutions, Flow Cytometry data analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.2.2, WooCommerce 3.6.7, jQuery 1.12.4, Slider Revolution 6.6.15, Yoast SEO plugin, Ajax Search Lite, WooCommerce Products Filter
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, indicating possible recent registration or privacy protection.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or header.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and theme indicates active maintenance.
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No security or incident response contact information found.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.2.2 with WooCommerce 3.6.7 and uses the Avada theme, indicating a mature CMS platform with e-commerce capabilities. It integrates several plugins for SEO (Yoast), search (Ajax Search Lite), and product filtering, supporting a rich user experience. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and YouTube. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization rated good. Accessibility features are basic but present. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates standard marketing and analytics integration. No hosting provider information was detected from the data. Technical risks include outdated WordPress and plugin versions which may require updates to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cytognos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cytognos.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.