Skip to main content

Security report for custom-culinary.com

Custom Culinary · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Custom Culinary is a culinary-related business currently preparing for launch, as indicated by the 'Launching Soon' message on their website. The site is built using GoDaddy Website Builder and hosted by GoDaddy.com, LLC. The technical infrastructure includes modern web fonts, service worker for PWA support, and reCAPTCHA on the contact form, indicating some level of digital maturity. However, the website content is minimal and lacks comprehensive business and privacy information. Security posture shows basic measures like reCAPTCHA and domain status protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. The WHOIS data is inconsistent with a future domain creation date, raising legitimacy concerns. Overall, the website is in early stages with moderate technical implementation but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching custom-culinary.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to target the hospitality sector, specifically culinary professionals or businesses, operating on a B2B model. The website currently lacks detailed content, making it difficult to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The use of GoDaddy Website Builder suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise with limited digital marketing sophistication. No social media or partner links are present, indicating a nascent online presence. The contact form with reCAPTCHA suggests intent to engage visitors securely. The domain registration inconsistencies and lack of public business contact details limit trust and credibility at this stage.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. The website uses HTTPS and reCAPTCHA on the contact form, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and privacy policy pages are gaps. The WHOIS data anomaly (future creation date) is a red flag for domain legitimacy. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not expose sensitive data visibly, but the lack of comprehensive security policies and controls suggests limited readiness for advanced threats or compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Correct WHOIS domain registration data to reflect accurate creation date and registrant information.
  5. Add verified business contact emails and phone numbers to improve credibility and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Custom Culinary
Description
Custom Culinary is a business related to culinary services or products, currently the website is under construction with a 'Launching Soon' message.
Key services
Culinary products or services (implied)
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, GoDaddy Website Builder, Service Worker (PWA support)
Platforms
GoDaddy Website Builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is under construction with 'Launching Soon' message
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Contact form present with reCAPTCHA protection
  4. Domain WHOIS data shows future creation date, which is suspicious
  5. No DNSSEC enabled on domain
  6. Website uses GoDaddy Website Builder and hosting
  7. No explicit security headers detected
  8. No business contact emails or phone numbers found
  9. Cookie banner present with consent mechanism
  10. No social media links found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on GoDaddy Website Builder platform with modern web fonts and PWA support via service workers. The site loads media content such as a video header and uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. Performance is moderate with basic SEO and accessibility features. The site is mobile optimized and uses standard HTML5 and CSS3. However, the lack of advanced frameworks or CMS features limits scalability. The hosting provider is GoDaddy, a reputable provider. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with custom-culinary.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review custom-culinary.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.