Skip to main content

Security report for curtisswright.com

Curtiss-Wright Corporation · Energy · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Curtiss-Wright Corporation is a well-established industrial and defense engineering company with a strong presence in the energy, commercial, and industrial sectors. The company offers specialized manufacturing and engineering solutions tailored to these markets, positioning itself as a reliable and efficient partner. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting B2B clients in specialized sectors. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 with modern front-end technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. While the site is mobile-optimized and offers a good user experience, there is room for improvement in accessibility and performance optimization. Security posture is moderate; domain registration protections are strong, but the site lacks visible security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching curtisswright.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention curtisswright.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
146
Employees
0
Customers
47
Third parties
99
Weak passwords
27%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for curtisswright.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Curtiss-Wright operates in critical sectors including defense, energy, and industrial markets, leveraging a long operational history since 1996. The company’s business model focuses on providing engineering and manufacturing solutions to commercial and government clients. The website content and structure indicate a mature organization with a clear market position and diversified service offerings. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication channel, likely to manage inquiries through forms. The company uses reputable registrars and DNS providers, indicating a focus on domain security. The presence of analytics and bot detection scripts shows an interest in monitoring user engagement and security threats. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. The domain is protected with clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses, reducing risk of hijacking. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security enhancement. The website lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS, which are recommended best practices. No security policy or incident response contact information is published, limiting transparency in security governance. The use of third-party analytics and bot detection scripts introduces some privacy considerations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the site is secure but could improve by adopting additional security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a security policy page and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Description
Unlocking success with reliable solutions tailored for Commercial, Industrial, Defense, and Energy markets, ensuring efficiency and excellence in every sector.
Key services
Engineering solutions, Manufacturing for defense and energy markets, Industrial components and systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Drupal 10, Revolution Slider, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
imirwin
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Monsido heatmaps, CleanTalk bot detector, imirwin analytics
Marketing tools
Monsido, imirwin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern front-end libraries.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on homepage HTML content.
  3. Contact information primarily via contact forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in provided content.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  5. Domain is well-established and protected against unauthorized transfer or deletion.
  6. External scripts include analytics and bot detection services.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. No visible security headers in provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Revolution Slider for UI components. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, providing DNS-level protection and performance benefits. The site includes external scripts for analytics (imirwin) and bot detection (CleanTalk), indicating active monitoring of traffic and security threats. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization, but accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. The site uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icons, contributing to a professional design. No critical technical issues were detected, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with curtisswright.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review curtisswright.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.