Skip to main content

Security report for currenta-gruppe.de

Currenta GmbH & Co. OHG · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Currenta GmbH & Co. OHG operates as a key service provider in the energy and industrial sectors, specializing in supply, disposal, safety, and management services for the CHEMPARK. The company offers tailored solutions ranging from material and energy supply to the development of disposal and safety concepts, as well as support in regulatory approval processes. Positioned as a significant player within the CHEMPARK ecosystem, Currenta targets industrial clients requiring comprehensive infrastructure and safety management services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and enhanced by security and privacy tools such as Wordfence, Cloudflare, and Real Cookie Banner Pro. The infrastructure includes Cloudflare CDN and DDoS protection, Matomo analytics for user behavior insights, and integration of marketing and social media tools. Security posture is strong with multiple layers of protection and GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms, although explicit security and incident response policies are not publicly documented. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, good performance, and robust privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching currenta-gruppe.de

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Currenta holds a strong market position as an essential service provider in the energy and chemical park management sector. Its business model revolves around providing critical infrastructure and safety services to industrial clients, particularly those operating within CHEMPARK. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with technology providers such as Microsoft Dynamics and Cloudflare to enhance operational efficiency and security. The presence of comprehensive privacy and cookie management indicates a commitment to regulatory compliance and user trust. The target customer segment includes large industrial enterprises requiring reliable energy and safety management solutions. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and the use of advanced analytics tools. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance transparency around security policies and incident response to further strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity, employing Wordfence for firewall and malware protection, Cloudflare for DDoS mitigation and bot management, and Cloudflare Turnstile for form spam prevention. Security headers are properly configured, and SSL/TLS is implemented with an excellent configuration. Privacy compliance is robust with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned privacy policies. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information represents a gap in transparency and readiness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security culture appears proactive but could benefit from publishing vulnerability disclosure guidelines and security contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance visibility of the Data Protection Officer contact details to improve privacy transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Currenta GmbH & Co. OHG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Currenta GmbH & Co. OHG
Description
Versorgung, Entsorgung und Sicherheit sowie das Management des CHEMPARK – das sind die Kernkompetenzen von CURRENTA. Unseren Kunden bieten wir individuelle Lösungen für unterschiedliche Ansprüche – von der Stoff- und Energieversorgung über die Entwicklung von Entsorgungs- und Sicherheitskonzepten bis hin zur Unterstützung bei Genehmigungsverfahren.
Key services
Stoffversorgung, Energieversorgung, Entsorgungskonzepte, Sicherheitskonzepte, Management des CHEMPARK, Unterstützung bei Genehmigungsverfahren
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Real Cookie Banner Pro, Cloudflare, Matomo Analytics, Microsoft Dynamics, Google Maps, YouTube embeds, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Wordfence firewall and security plugin
  • Cloudflare DDoS protection and bot management
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile for form spam protection
  • Cookie consent management with Real Cookie Banner Pro

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Matomo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Maps, YouTube
Marketing tools
Walls.io Social Media Wall
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent requirements.
  3. Use of multiple security layers including Cloudflare and Wordfence.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity.
  6. Active social media presence linked.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for design flexibility and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It leverages Cloudflare for hosting, CDN, and security services, ensuring good performance and protection against common web threats. Analytics are handled via Matomo, providing privacy-conscious user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Use of Real Cookie Banner Pro ensures compliance with cookie consent regulations. Technical debt appears minimal with up-to-date plugins and no deprecated technologies detected. Opportunities exist to further modernize by integrating a dedicated security policy framework and enhancing incident response capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with currenta-gruppe.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review currenta-gruppe.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.