Skip to main content

Security report for cslbehring.it

CSL Behring · Healthcare · Italy

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CSL Behring Italia operates as a healthcare and biopharmaceutical company dedicated to developing and providing therapies that improve patient quality of life. The company collaborates with government authorities and funds medical research, positioning itself as a significant player in the Italian healthcare market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting patients, healthcare professionals, and stakeholders in Italy. Technically, the site employs modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with no signs of blocking or WAF interference, but could enhance compliance transparency by publishing privacy and terms of service documents.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cslbehring.it

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CSL Behring Italia is positioned as a large healthcare entity focused on biotherapeutics and patient support services. Its business model revolves around therapy development, patient engagement, and medical research funding. The company targets patients and healthcare professionals within Italy, leveraging partnerships such as the linked newsroom domain for media and communications. The website's content and structure indicate a stable market presence with consistent branding and professional communication. Revenue streams likely include pharmaceutical product sales and research collaborations. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a controlled communication channel via contact forms, aligning with corporate compliance practices. The company benefits from a strong parent company, CSL Limited, enhancing its credibility and market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy pages are published, limiting transparency and readiness indicators. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the provided content. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which is managed through consent. To elevate security maturity, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, publish security and incident response policies, and provide clear contact channels for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but improvable.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages clearly accessible from the website.
  2. Implement and display a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  4. Provide direct contact information including verified company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CSL Behring
Description
CSL Behring Italia is a healthcare company focused on developing and providing therapies to improve patients' quality of life, collaborating with government authorities and funding medical research.
Key services
Therapy development, Patient support, Medical research funding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Brightcove video player
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Contact information is primarily via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  5. Use of modern tracking and consent technologies like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or suspicious external links.
  8. Content is focused on healthcare and patient support, suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating awareness of privacy and tracking regulations. Brightcove is used for video content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. However, no specific CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the content. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but minimal descriptive content. Accessibility features are basic but present, such as skip-to-content links. Technical risks include the lack of security headers and limited transparency on data retention policies. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO, accessibility, and security configurations to improve overall digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cslbehring.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cslbehring.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.