Skip to main content

Security report for cscglobal.com

CSC · Finance · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CSC is a global enterprise specializing in registered agent, compliance, tax, fund administration, capital markets, and digital brand and cyber-risk solutions. The company targets Fortune 500 corporations and large enterprises, providing comprehensive business services across more than 140 jurisdictions. Their market position is strong, supported by a consistent brand presence and trust indicators such as BBB accreditation and client testimonials. The website content is professional, well-structured, and designed to serve a sophisticated B2B audience. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Optimizely for analytics and optimization. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, delivering a good user experience with moderate performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and explicit security policies are absent. The WHOIS data is notably missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a domain of this profile and introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration transparency. However, the website content and external trust signals strongly support the legitimacy of the business. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, indicating compliance with data protection regulations. Overall, CSC presents as a credible, enterprise-level business with a mature digital presence. The main risk lies in the lack of WHOIS transparency and absence of published security policies, which should be addressed to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cscglobal.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CSC operates in the finance and technology sectors, providing essential services to large corporations globally. Their business model focuses on B2B service delivery in compliance, entity management, tax solutions, and digital brand protection. The company leverages partnerships with specialized service providers (e.g., AppealTrack, Intertrust Group) to extend its offerings. CSC's competitive advantage lies in its extensive jurisdictional coverage, market-leading expertise, and integrated service portfolio. The company targets high-value clients such as Fortune 500 companies and law firms, indicating a focus on enterprise revenue streams. Growth indicators include a broad service catalog and active content marketing via blogs and resources. The partnership ecosystem is robust, supporting a comprehensive client service experience.

Security posture

CSC's website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. The use of cookie consent mechanisms aligns with privacy best practices. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in transparency and readiness. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The use of third-party scripts (Google Tag Manager, Optimizely) is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing dedicated security documentation and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  3. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CSC
Description
A provider of Registered Agent, UCC search and filing, compliance and entity services, CSC helps Fortune 500 corporations do business better.
Key services
Registered Agent Services, Entity Solutions, Business Administration and Compliance, Fund Solutions, Capital Markets Services, Tax Solutions, Digital Brand and Cyber-Risk Solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Optimizely
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management scripts for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Optimizely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Optimizely
Marketing tools
Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive, professionally presented, and targeted at enterprise clients.
  3. Strong branding consistency and trust signals such as BBB accreditation and client testimonials.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a domain of this profile.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Google Tag Manager and Optimizely for analytics and optimization. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDN-hosted resources. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence with opportunities for performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cscglobal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cscglobal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.