Skip to main content

Security report for cryptobrokers.es

Cryptobrokers.ru · Finance · N/a

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cryptobrokers.es is a multilingual online platform specializing in monitoring and comparing cryptocurrency exchangers and electronic payment systems. The site provides users with updated exchange rates, reviews, and reserve information to facilitate optimal currency conversions. It targets users engaged in electronic asset transactions, offering a user-friendly interface and frequent data updates. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security measures include HTTPS and CAPTCHA integration, though some security headers are missing. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and lack of WHOIS data limit full trust assessment. Overall, the platform is functional and serves a niche financial market with moderate professionalism and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cryptobrokers.es

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on cryptocurrency exchange monitoring. It leverages a business model based on providing comparative data and user reviews without direct cooperation with exchangers. The multilingual presence suggests targeting a broad international audience. Revenue streams likely include advertising and possibly affiliate partnerships, though no explicit affiliate programs were detected. The site maintains a moderate market position with a comprehensive list of supported currencies and payment systems. Partnerships appear limited to sister sites in different languages. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and integration with social media channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but would benefit from enhanced headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cryptobrokers.ru
Description
Cryptobrokers es un portal que ofrece un sistema de monitoreo para intercambiadores en línea, facilitando la conversión de activos electrónicos y criptomonedas con opciones rentables, evaluación basada en opiniones reales, y selección del mejor curso de cambio.
Key services
Monitoreo de intercambiadores, Comparación de tasas de cambio, Opiniones y reputación de intercambiadores, Información actualizada de reservas y comentarios
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Google reCAPTCHA, DataTables, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Regular updates implied by plugin versions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Yandex.RTB (commented out)
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on cryptocurrency exchange monitoring and comparison.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query restrictions from Red.es.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and tracking tools.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  7. Social media links present for Twitter, VKontakte, Instagram, and RSS feed.
  8. Multiple language versions of the site exist, indicating international reach.
  9. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but missing some security headers.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery, DataTables, and Google Analytics for functionality and tracking. The presence of Yoast SEO plugin indicates attention to search engine optimization. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and some DNS prefetching. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a content-driven financial monitoring site, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cryptobrokers.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cryptobrokers.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.