Skip to main content

Security report for crosseye.at

crosseye Marketing GmbH · Hospitality · Austria

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

crosseye Marketing GmbH is a specialized tourism marketing agency based in Austria, focusing on digital marketing services such as SEO, SEA, social media, content creation, and workshops tailored for tourism businesses and destinations. The company holds several certifications and maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and integrates modern analytics tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Matomo, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible security headers and incident response disclosures. Overall, the website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, serving its niche market effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crosseye.at

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
15
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small-sized essential entity within the hospitality and tourism marketing sector in Austria. It targets tourism businesses and destinations primarily in the Steiermark region, offering a comprehensive suite of digital marketing services. The business model is service-oriented, leveraging workshops, consulting, and project management to generate revenue. The presence of multiple certifications and partnerships, including Google Partner status, enhances its competitive positioning. The website content and structure indicate a consistent branding strategy and a focus on client engagement through newsletters, social media, and events. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation with a focused regional market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting compliance with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP) and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The use of reputable analytics platforms is balanced with privacy considerations, including an opt-out mechanism for Google Analytics. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Enhancing security headers and publishing a security policy would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or a dedicated security policy page to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  3. Add explicit contact channels for security incidents such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
crosseye Marketing GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
crosseye Marketing GmbH
Description
crosseye Marketing is a tourism marketing agency offering services such as online marketing, workshops, projects, website design, content creation, storytelling, social media, SEO, and SEA.
Key services
Online Marketing, Workshops & Seminars, Website Design, Content & Storytelling, Social Media Management, SEO & SEA, Project Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, FlexSlider
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (base href uses https)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Google Analytics opt-out script present
  • Matomo analytics with local hosting

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern marketing and analytics tools.
  2. Cookie consent and privacy policies are well implemented and GDPR compliant.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  5. Multiple certifications and trust badges enhance credibility.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  7. Mobile optimization and SEO are well addressed.
  8. Security headers are missing or not visible in provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system, and uses jQuery along with FlexSlider for interactive elements. Analytics are handled via Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and a self-hosted Matomo instance, indicating a balanced approach to data collection and privacy. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta descriptions, keywords, and canonical links. Performance is moderate, with some assets loaded asynchronously. The absence of visible security headers and incident response mechanisms represents technical debt and potential risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crosseye.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crosseye.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.