Skip to main content

Security report for crosscafe.cz

CrossCafe · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, DNS health and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CrossCafe is a Czech coffeehouse chain providing coffee, cakes, and related products through physical locations and an e-commerce platform. The website demonstrates a solid digital presence with integrated cookie consent mechanisms and advertising/tracking technologies such as Google Analytics, Adform, and Facebook Pixel. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and ownership. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are exposed on the site, which may impact user trust and business credibility. Security policies and incident response information are not publicly available, indicating room for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crosscafe.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CrossCafe operates in the hospitality sector, targeting coffee consumers and franchise partners primarily in the Czech Republic. The business model includes retail coffeehouse services, an e-shop for cakes and coffee products, and franchising opportunities. The website links to related domains for account login, roasting e-shop, and franchising, indicating a diversified ecosystem. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and provides detailed cookie and privacy information, reflecting awareness of GDPR compliance. The lack of explicit contact details and WHOIS data suggests potential gaps in public business information disclosure.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent tools to comply with privacy regulations. It employs Google Tag Manager and multiple advertising/tracking services, which increases the complexity of data collection and privacy management. No security headers were detected in the provided content, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism reduces transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good encryption but lacking in documented policies and advanced header protections.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish explicit privacy policy, terms of service, and security policy pages with clear URLs.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  4. Provide verified company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability to improve domain trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CrossCafe
Description
CrossCafe is a Czech coffeehouse chain offering coffee, cakes, and related products with an e-shop and franchising options. The business targets coffee consumers and franchise partners in the Czech Republic.
Key services
Coffeehouse services, E-shop for cakes and coffee products, Franchising opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery (implied by usage of common scripts), Google Fonts, Adform tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Meta Platforms, Inc., Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Adform tracking pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Multiple external tracking and advertising services are used.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service URLs found but privacy and cookie policies are embedded or linked.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Google Fonts, and Adform tracking scripts. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph images. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA roles and semantic HTML. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crosscafe.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crosscafe.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.