Skip to main content

Security report for crops.com

Digimedia.com, L.P. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Yeah.com is a web directory and search portal operated by Digimedia.com, L.P., offering categorized web listings and search functionalities across various topics. The site primarily generates revenue through advertising placements and targets a general audience seeking curated web content. The technical infrastructure includes common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics, with basic mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is limited, with no detected security headers and unknown SSL enforcement, though cookie consent and CSRF tokens are implemented. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site presents a basic but functional web directory with moderate trust indicators but requires improvements in security and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: 0.0.0.0

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crops.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector as a niche web directory and search portal, leveraging advertising as its business model. It is owned by Digimedia.com, L.P., which appears to be the parent company. The site lacks detailed business contact information and certifications, limiting its credibility. The target market is broad, encompassing general internet users seeking categorized web content. The partnership ecosystem includes Google services for analytics and advertising. Growth indicators and strategic positioning are unclear due to limited business data. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its curated directory listings, but it faces challenges in trust and transparency.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is basic. While HTTPS usage is implied but not explicitly confirmed, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. The site uses CSRF tokens and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating some awareness of security and privacy. However, the lack of contact information for incident response, absence of security policies, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms highlight compliance gaps. Data protection practices appear minimal, and incident response readiness is not evident. Overall, the security posture requires significant enhancement to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with HSTS to secure all communications.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear contact information and security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed data retention policies and GDPR-specific disclosures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digimedia.com, L.P.
Description
Yeah.com is a web directory and search portal operated by Digimedia.com, L.P. It provides categorized web directories and search functionalities across various topics such as Vacation, Technology, Health & Beauty, Gifts, Personal Finance, and Home.
Key services
Web directory listings, Search engine functionality, Advertising placements
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads Domains CAF
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • CSRF tokens present in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads Domains CAF
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a basic web directory and search portal operated by Digimedia.com, L.P.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanism
  4. No contact information or business address found on the site
  5. No security headers detected and SSL configuration unknown
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking
  7. No adult or explicit content detected
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  9. Website design and content quality are basic with moderate trust indicators
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack including jQuery 3.3.1, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. It lacks a detectable CMS and does not show evidence of modern frameworks or platforms. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with limited meta tags and no structured data. The site relies heavily on third-party scripts for advertising and analytics, which may introduce security risks. There is no visible hosting provider information or advanced technical infrastructure. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, improve performance, and enhance technical SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crops.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crops.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.