Skip to main content

Security report for crimemedicine.ro

Agenția Națională a Medicamentului și a Dispozitivelor Medicale din România · Healthcare · Romania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.crimemedicine.ro is an official platform managed by the Romanian National Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (ANMDMR). It serves as a public resource to combat counterfeit medicines by collecting reports from citizens and healthcare professionals, analyzing these reports, and coordinating with authorities to remove counterfeit products from the market. The site features a comprehensive archive of important announcements and alerts related to counterfeit medicines, demonstrating a commitment to public health and safety. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Parallax-One theme, incorporating common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome. The site is accessible over HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating a basic level of privacy compliance. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. From a security perspective, the site shows good practices like HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and a published vulnerability disclosure policy. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. The WHOIS data is privacy protected by ROTLD, which is typical for Romanian domains, and the domain appears legitimate and consistent with the official nature of the website. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and serves an important public health function. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing an incident response contact, and maintaining regular updates to software components to ensure ongoing security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crimemedicine.ro

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates within the healthcare and government sectors, focusing on public safety by addressing the issue of counterfeit medicines. Its business model is service-oriented, providing a channel for reporting and disseminating information rather than commercial transactions. The target audience includes healthcare professionals, patients, and the general public concerned with medicine authenticity. The site’s market position is that of an authoritative government resource, which lends it high credibility. The presence of extensive historical announcements indicates sustained activity and engagement. The lack of commercial advertising or affiliate links aligns with its public service mission. Partnerships are implied through external links to health organizations and regulatory bodies, reinforcing its ecosystem within public health governance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests potential areas for hardening against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the site is secure enough for its informational purpose but would benefit from enhanced security controls and formalized vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize risk from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Consider adding structured data for organization and contact information to improve SEO and trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Agenția Națională a Medicamentului și a Dispozitivelor Medicale din România
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agenția Națională a Medicamentului și a Dispozitivelor Medicale din România
Description
Platform dedicated to combating counterfeit medicines by collecting reports from the public and professionals, analyzing them, and coordinating with authorities to remove counterfeit medicines from the market.
Key services
Receiving counterfeit medicine reports, Analyzing and investigating reports, Coordinating removal of counterfeit medicines
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Parallax-One WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official government platform focused on combating counterfeit medicines in Romania.
  2. Content is comprehensive with many historical announcements and alerts.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. No WHOIS registrant data available due to ROTLD privacy policy.
  5. Cookie consent is implemented in Romanian language.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. No social media links found on the homepage.
  8. No forms other than a link to a report submission page; no form fields detected in homepage HTML.
  9. External links mostly point to official health organizations and government sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Parallax-One theme, leveraging jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality and styling. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization indicators such as caching or CDN usage detected in the HTML. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. SEO is basic with meta viewport and title tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph metadata. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and landmarks but could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a government informational site but could be modernized for better performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crimemedicine.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crimemedicine.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.