Skip to main content

Security report for crfhealth.com

Signant Health · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Signant Health is a well-established healthcare technology company specializing in clinical trial technologies and services. Founded in 2019, it leverages 30 years of industry experience to provide best-in-class eClinical solutions, including electronic clinical outcome assessments, data collection platforms, patient engagement tools, and clinical data analytics. The company targets pharmaceutical sponsors, CROs, and biotech firms globally, positioning itself as a trusted partner in delivering high-quality, reliable clinical trial data to support regulatory submissions and trial decisions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its audience. Technically, the website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Demandbase for analytics and advertising. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics in place. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and domain registration consistent and transparent. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no visible security policy or vulnerability disclosure page. Overall, the security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Privacy compliance is good, supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Business credibility is high, supported by trust indicators such as scientific advisory boards and a history of supporting drug approvals. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts, and enhancing accessibility features to further improve compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crfhealth.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Signant Health operates in the healthcare technology sector, focusing on clinical trial data solutions. Its business model is B2B SaaS combined with professional services, targeting pharmaceutical companies, CROs, and biotech firms. The company leverages its extensive industry experience and scientific expertise as competitive advantages. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, implementation services, and consulting. The company maintains a global presence with multiple subdomains for careers, support, and resources, indicating a mature operational structure. Partnerships and integrations with clinical research stakeholders enhance its market position. The website content and structure reflect a focus on trust, quality, and scientific credibility, supporting its growth and customer acquisition strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, multiple security headers, and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, and privacy policies are comprehensive. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information represents a compliance gap. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved to enhance DNS security. Overall, the site is secure for visitors and customers, but publishing additional security documentation would strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information and a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Signant Health
Description
Best-in-class clinical trial technologies and services, generating high-quality trial data for sponsors and CROs worldwide.
Key services
eCOA, EDC, Unified eClinical Platform, Clinical IP Management, Patient Engagement, Clinical Data and Analytics, Clinical Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Demandbase, Bugherd
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-732877092)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Demandbase
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, Demandbase, Bugherd
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured
  2. Content is relevant and targeted to clinical trial industry
  3. Multiple external subdomains for careers, support, marketplace, and resources
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  5. No visible security or privacy policy gaps
  6. No terms of service page found
  7. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. Use of HubSpot CMS and marketing/analytics tools is extensive
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on HubSpot CMS with Amazon Registrar as the domain registrar and AWS DNS servers. It uses modern front-end technologies including Font Awesome for icons, AOS for animations, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Demandbase, and Bugherd for bug tracking. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, supporting a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crfhealth.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crfhealth.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.