Skip to main content

Security report for crakrevenue.com

CrakRevenue · Media · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CrakRevenue is a leading CPA network specializing in affiliate marketing within the adult industry, offering a broad portfolio of verticals including Cam, Dating, OnlyFans Models, AI, and Gaming. The company positions itself as the largest and most trusted network in its niche, providing affiliates and advertisers with advanced promotion tools and a comprehensive dashboard for campaign management. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content tailored to its target audience of affiliates and advertisers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics integrations such as Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, and Facebook Pixel. It employs various marketing and tracking technologies, including AI-powered Smartlinks and interactive widgets, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are excellent, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party services for analytics and user engagement. However, explicit security headers are not clearly detected, and there is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, as it reduces transparency and trustworthiness despite the professional appearance and positive user reviews. Overall, CrakRevenue presents a strong business and technical profile with minor security and transparency gaps. Strategic improvements in domain registration transparency and security header implementation would enhance its trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crakrevenue.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CrakRevenue operates as a large-scale affiliate marketing network focused on the adult industry, leveraging a diversified portfolio of verticals to attract a wide range of affiliates and advertisers. Its business model centers on CPA offers, revshare, and PPS campaigns, supported by AI-driven promotion tools and a robust affiliate dashboard. The company has established a strong market position through longevity (claimed 15+ years), industry awards, and positive customer testimonials. Its partnership ecosystem includes subsidiary platforms like FansRevenue and dedicated support services. Growth indicators include continuous content updates, new verticals like AI, and active community engagement. The company targets affiliates seeking high payouts and advertisers aiming for quality traffic and brand visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of trusted analytics and marketing scripts is evident, though the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No public security policy or incident response contacts are found, which limits transparency in handling security events. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a risk factor, potentially indicating privacy protection or registrar issues. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in header implementation and public security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publicly disclose a vulnerability disclosure and incident response policy with dedicated contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Audit and monitor third-party scripts regularly to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available and consistent with business information.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures with detailed data retention policies and user rights information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CrakRevenue
Description
Maximize your earnings with CrakRevenue's top affiliate programs. Choose from a variety of offers including dating, cam, AI health & OnlyFans Models
Key services
Affiliate programs in Cam, Dating, OnlyFans Models, AI, Gaming, Promotion tools including AI-powered Smartlinks, banners, widgets, Affiliate dashboard with statistics, offers, achievements, Advertiser services for brand visibility and traffic monetization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Tiny Slider, Intercom, Crazy Egg, Quantcast, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, OneSignal
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure analytics and tracking scripts
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Crazy Egg, Quantcast
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
CrakRevenue Affiliate Network
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Quantcast, Reddit Pixel, Crazy Egg
Marketing tools
Smartlinks, Banner Ads, Live Cam Widget, Pre-Roll Ads, Cam Swipe, Postitial, Prestitial
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional and consistent branding with strong trust signals
  3. Comprehensive affiliate marketing platform with multiple verticals
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No visible security or privacy policy gaps on the website
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern technology stack including Slider Revolution for UI elements, Tiny Slider for carousels, and multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Crazy Egg, and Facebook Pixel. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with comprehensive meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and CDN usage for static assets. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security management. The absence of hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crakrevenue.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crakrevenue.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.