Skip to main content

Security report for cpihotels.com

CPI Hotels, a.s. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CPI Hotels, a.s. operates a large hospitality business offering tailored accommodation services across six countries with nearly 40 hotels and over 4000 rooms. Their services include hotel bookings, conference and event hosting, special offers, and a corporate loyalty program targeting both leisure and business travelers. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, and cookie consent management, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though explicit security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR and cookie policies present. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status, which should be verified for full trust. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency on domain registration and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cpihotels.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CPI Hotels holds a strong market position in the hospitality sector, operating multiple hotel brands in key European cities and leisure destinations. Their business model focuses on accommodation, event hosting, and customer loyalty, appealing to a broad customer base including tourists and corporate clients. The company leverages digital marketing and social media to enhance brand presence. The website's integration of booking forms and loyalty programs indicates a direct-to-consumer revenue stream. Partnerships with sustainability initiatives and ethical hotlines suggest corporate responsibility efforts. The lack of visible direct contact details may indicate a preference for digital communication channels. The missing WHOIS data is unusual and warrants further investigation to ensure domain ownership aligns with business claims.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, secure form handling, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel indicates moderate user tracking balanced with privacy controls. However, the absence of explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap in security best practices. Overall, the site is secure but could improve by publishing formal security policies and enhancing header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Create and publish a security policy page including incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance contact information availability by providing direct company emails or phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CPI Hotels, a.s.
Description
CPI Hotels offers tailored accommodation services across multiple countries with nearly 40 hotels and 4000+ rooms. They provide hotel stays, conference and event spaces, special offers, and a corporate loyalty program.
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Conference and event hosting, Special offers and vouchers, Loyalty program
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Sentry, Easepick date picker, Cookies Giant consent management
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with validation
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Seznam Retargeting
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookies Giant Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive booking forms
  2. Strong focus on hospitality and event services across multiple countries
  3. Comprehensive legal and privacy documentation present
  4. Use of modern web technologies and consent management
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or footer; contact likely via forms
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  8. WHOIS data missing, raising questions about domain registration status
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and performant technology stack including JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5 with asynchronous loading of scripts such as Google Tag Manager and cookie consent management tools. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of a known CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is fast with optimized images and lazy loading. Technical debt appears low with no broken elements or errors detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cpihotels.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cpihotels.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.