Skip to main content

Security report for cpce.net

CANBERRA PACKARD Central Europe GmbH · Energy · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CANBERRA PACKARD Central Europe GmbH is a well-established company specializing in the sales, installation, and servicing of nuclear and environmental radiation detection and measurement equipment, as well as medical radiation diagnostic and therapy equipment. Founded in 1987 in Austria, the company has grown to become the largest supplier in Central and Eastern Europe, serving a diverse clientele including government organizations, nuclear power plants, research centers, and international bodies. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with relevant content and clear contact information, targeting industry professionals and institutional customers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 running PHP 8.2.28 and hosted on DigitalOcean infrastructure. While the site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility, performance metrics are lacking, and SEO optimization is basic. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical security shortfall, exposing users to potential risks and undermining trust. Security headers are minimal, and no advanced security frameworks or incident response policies are evident. From a security perspective, the site’s posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS, no cookie or privacy policies, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The SPF record is valid, and DNS configurations are consistent with the business location, but the SSL/TLS configuration is non-existent, which is a major vulnerability. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, indicating open accessibility but also potential exposure. Overall, the site is functional and professional in content but requires urgent improvements in security and privacy compliance to meet modern standards. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS with a valid certificate, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and enhancing security headers and incident response readiness to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cpce.net

This scan found 5 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a leading supplier of radiation detection and measurement equipment in Central and Eastern Europe. Its business model focuses on direct sales, installation, and comprehensive after-sales support, targeting institutional clients such as nuclear power plants, government agencies, and international organizations. The company’s growth is supported by a network of local offices and a diversified product portfolio including medical and analytical instrumentation. The website content and WHOIS data confirm a consistent and legitimate business presence. However, the lack of digital marketing tools and analytics suggests a traditional approach to customer engagement. The absence of social media and affiliate partnerships indicates limited digital ecosystem integration.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak, primarily due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical vulnerability. The server uses openresty with PHP 8.2.28 but does not support any TLS protocols, leaving communications unencrypted. Security headers are minimal, with only a strict-transport-security header present but not enabled. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published. The SPF record is correctly configured, reducing email spoofing risk. Overall, the site lacks essential security best practices, exposing both the company and its users to potential threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide immediately.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Enable and configure security headers including HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  5. Integrate analytics and monitoring tools to improve user insights and security monitoring.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern PHP version (8.2.28) and WordPress 6.8.1, hosted on DigitalOcean infrastructure. The tech stack is standard for corporate sites but lacks advanced frameworks or performance optimizations. The site’s performance data is missing, indicating potential issues with load times. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, reflecting adherence to modern web standards. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The absence of HTTPS and TLS protocols is a significant technical risk. The site uses standard WordPress scripts and styles with no third-party analytics or advertising scripts detected, indicating minimal tracking and marketing integration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cpce.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cpce.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.