Skip to main content

Security report for coziest.ee

TULUCOM OÜ · Hospitality · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Coziest is a small Estonian hospitality business operated by TULUCOM OÜ, offering comfortable and homely rental apartments and mini houses across Estonia, including Tallinn, Haapsalu, Meremõisa, and Kalaranna. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with SEO optimization and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The business targets travelers and temporary residents seeking reliable accommodation solutions in Estonia. The company presents clear contact information and social media presence, enhancing trust and accessibility. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as WordPress CMS, Yoast SEO, Swiper.js for sliders, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks security headers and formal security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating gaps in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and credible from a business perspective but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices. There are no signs of blocking or WAF interference, allowing full content access and analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coziest.ee

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Coziest operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on short and long-term rental accommodations in Estonia. Its competitive advantage lies in curated, comfortable lodging options across multiple Estonian locations, appealing to both business and leisure travelers. The business model is direct rental service with online booking integration via a third-party platform (bouk.io). Revenue streams likely include rental fees and ancillary services such as boat rental. The company maintains a modest but consistent brand presence with social media engagement and a professional website. Growth potential exists through expanding property listings and enhancing digital marketing. Partnerships include the website developer ED for hotels and booking platform bouk.io. The company is registered and transparent, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, limiting transparency and preparedness. Absence of a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure process reduces trust for security researchers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanism, posing regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common attacks.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TULUCOM OÜ
Registration number
12563607
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TULUCOM OÜ
Description
Coziest pakub mugavaid ja koduseid majutuslahendusi üle Eesti, sealhulgas kortereid Tallinnas, Haapsalus, Meremõisas ja Kalaranna piirkonnas. Teenus sobib äri-, puhkusereisideks ja ajutiseks elukohaks.
Key services
Katusekorterid Tallinnas, Korter Haapsalus, Majutus Meremõisas, Kalaranna korterid, Kaatri rent
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Swiper.js slider, Google Tag Manager, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress theme edhotels and edhotels_child
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. SSL is enabled and properly configured.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. Content is primarily in Estonian with English alternate language links.
  10. Business appears to be a small hospitality company offering rental apartments and mini houses in Estonia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a custom child theme (edhotels_child) and the Yoast SEO plugin for search optimization. It uses Swiper.js for interactive sliders and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site loads moderate resources and is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No hosting provider details were detected from the HTML. The site lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization in security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coziest.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coziest.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.