Skip to main content

Security report for costanavarino.com

Costa Navarino · Hospitality · Greece

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Costa Navarino is a premier luxury hospitality and real estate destination located in Messinia, Greece. The website showcases multiple 5-star resorts, golf courses, spa centers, and real estate offerings, positioning itself as a sustainable and authentic Mediterranean travel experience. The business is part of TEMES S.A., a known entity in the hospitality sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks a publicly available security policy or incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, requiring further verification. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and targets affluent travelers and investors seeking luxury and sustainability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching costanavarino.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the luxury hospitality and real estate sectors, targeting high-net-worth individuals and tourists interested in premium experiences. Its competitive advantage lies in its sustainable development approach, multiple luxury resorts, and integration of cultural and authentic local experiences. Revenue streams include accommodation bookings, golf and spa services, real estate sales, and events. The partnership ecosystem includes major hotel brands like Marriott and Mandarin Oriental, enhancing market credibility. Growth indicators include recent content updates and expansion of real estate offerings. The company maintains a strong digital presence with multilingual support and active social media channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices appear adequate, but explicit information about a Data Protection Officer or incident response readiness is missing. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or page to improve transparency.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Provide contact details for a Data Protection Officer to enhance GDPR compliance.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Costa Navarino
Description
Costa Navarino is a luxury travel destination in Greece located in Messinia, southwest Peloponnese. It offers sustainable, high-end hospitality services including four 5-star resorts, golf courses, spa centers, dining venues, and real estate opportunities.
Key services
Luxury resort accommodations, Golf courses and academy, Spa and wellness services, Real estate sales and villa rentals, Cultural and authentic local experiences
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yoast SEO, WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin), Slick Slider, MozMap API
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed luxury hospitality and real estate portal.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and SEO optimized.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. Multiple external trusted domains are linked, including Marriott and Mandarin Oriental.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tracking tools.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery, Slick Slider, and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site employs Yoast SEO and WPML for multilingual support, indicating a focus on SEO and international visitors. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical infrastructure supports a rich multimedia experience with optimized images and responsive design. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to improve performance through further optimization and to enhance security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with costanavarino.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review costanavarino.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.