Skip to main content

Security report for cortijosocialmedia.com

Cortijo Social Media · Media · Spain

Partial score · DNS & email only

71/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cortijo Social Media is a Spanish communication agency established since 1996, offering services including public relations, event organization, audiovisual production, branding, and communication consulting. The website presents a professional image with clear navigation and good content quality, targeting institutions and companies seeking communication support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and explicit privacy or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration transparency raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cortijosocialmedia.com

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector, focusing on communication services for institutional and corporate clients. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive communication solutions, including event management and branding. The website reflects a small-sized agency with a consistent brand presence. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, relying on a contact form. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration details may impact trust from potential clients. No evident partnerships or certifications are displayed, suggesting a focus on direct client relationships. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact information, limiting transparency in security management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms indicates potential non-compliance with GDPR cookie regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy with GDPR compliance statements and data protection officer contact if applicable.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cortijo Social Media
Description
Agencia de servicios plenos en comunicación. Cortijo Social Media, trabajamos desde 1996 para apoyar a instituciones y empresas en la consecución o consolidación de sus objetivos de comunicación.
Key services
Public relations and events, Audiovisual and multimedia production, Design, creativity, art direction and branding, Communication cabinet
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, WordPress, Yoast SEO, qTranslate-X
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and focused on communication services.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active business website.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via form only.
  6. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin, and multilingual support is provided by qTranslate-X. The site loads external scripts from trusted CDNs like Google APIs. Performance is moderate with some modern JavaScript libraries but could benefit from optimization. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. No hosting provider information is available from the data. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure data transmission.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cortijosocialmedia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cortijosocialmedia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.