Skip to main content

Security report for corporatelivewireinnovationawards.com

Corporate LiveWire · Media · United Kingdom

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Corporate LiveWire Innovation Awards is a UK-based awards platform operated under Fenice Media, targeting businesses internationally and domestically to recognize excellence and innovation. The website offers nomination forms, detailed award processes, and promotional opportunities for winners, supported by a dedicated editorial and judging team. The platform leverages WordPress with modern plugins and page builders, providing a professional and user-friendly experience. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, though additional HTTP security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is currently lacking explicit policies, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the site demonstrates a credible and established business presence with moderate technical maturity and good content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching corporatelivewireinnovationawards.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention corporatelivewireinnovationawards.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for corporatelivewireinnovationawards.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media and awards sector, focusing on recognizing and promoting business excellence across industries. It has a stable market position with a decade of operation and a parent company, Fenice Media, that manages multiple publications. The business model centers on award nominations, judging, and promotional services, including events and digital publications. The target audience includes SMEs and multinational corporations seeking recognition. The company maintains active social media channels and offers various promotional packages to winners, indicating a diversified revenue stream. The website content and structure reflect a professional approach with consistent branding and trust signals such as experienced leadership and transparent judging processes.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect form submissions, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for enhancement to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The site lacks explicit security or incident response policies publicly available, which could improve transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from implementing recommended best practices and formalizing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and security contact information to improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Corporate LiveWire
Description
Corporate LiveWire Innovation Awards recognize UK-based and international businesses across industries for excellence in products and services. They provide awards, promotional opportunities, and events for winners.
Key services
Business awards, Nomination and judging process, Promotional packages, Events and ceremonies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WPBakery Page Builder, Gravity Forms, Smart Slider 3, Ultimate VC Addons, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional awards platform targeting businesses internationally and in the UK.
  2. Content is well structured with clear sections about awards, nomination process, judges, FAQs, and events.
  3. Use of modern WordPress plugins and page builders indicates a maintained site.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. Contact is primarily via nomination form; no direct company emails or phone numbers publicly listed.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn is active and linked.
  7. Security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional HTTP headers.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content or domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and WPBakery page builders, with additional plugins such as Gravity Forms and Smart Slider 3 enhancing functionality. The tech stack is modern and widely supported, facilitating ease of content management and user interaction. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Opportunities exist to improve technical security and accessibility compliance, as well as to optimize performance further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with corporatelivewireinnovationawards.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review corporatelivewireinnovationawards.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.