Skip to main content

Security report for coralfinance.lv

CORAL FINANCE · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Coral Finance is a Latvian-based accounting service provider specializing in outsourced accounting and financial services for both legal entities and individuals within Latvia and the EU. The company offers a broad range of services including company registration, tax consulting, financial reporting according to IFRS standards, and representation before tax authorities. Their market position is that of a professional, small-sized service provider with a clear focus on quality and client support. The website reflects a professional digital presence with multilingual support and integration of modern web technologies such as service workers and analytics tools. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms are recommended. Overall, Coral Finance presents a trustworthy and credible business profile with clear contact information and social media presence, though WHOIS data is unavailable for full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coralfinance.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets Latvian and EU-based businesses and individuals seeking professional accounting outsourcing. Their business model revolves around providing comprehensive accounting solutions remotely, reducing client operational overhead. Partnerships with local business associations and use of licensed accounting software enhance their service quality and market credibility. The website content and structured data indicate a focus on transparency, reliability, and client trust. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and professional branding. The absence of direct online forms suggests a preference for personalized client interaction via phone or email. Strategic partnerships with local organizations and a professional website developer further support their market positioning.

Security posture

Coral Finance demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of service workers for progressive web app capabilities. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms and explicit privacy/security policies may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating potential areas for improvement in security governance and transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced compliance and security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for abuse or security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear terms of service to improve user trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Coral Finance"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CORAL FINANCE
Description
Plaša spektra grāmatvedības pakalpojumi juridiskām un fiziskām personām Latvijā un ES valstīs: pārbaudam un sastādam pārskatus pēc IFRS standartiem.
Key services
Uzņēmuma dibināšana, reģistrācija, Finanšu un nodokļu konsultācijas, Uzņēmuma gada pārskats, Deklarācijas iesniegšana VID, PVN maksātāja reģistrēšana, Grāmatvedības audits, Pieslēgšanās elektroniskās deklarēšanas sistēmai, Pārskatu sastādīšana un iesniegšana dienestā, Operatīvo pārskatu sagatavošana līzinga un banku iestādēm
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, skrollr, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, Ecwid e-commerce script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service worker registered for PWA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow
Marketing tools
Ecwid e-commerce
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. Business contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source; recommend adding for improved security.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, WhatsApp, Google My Business, and Waze links.
  8. No forms detected in the HTML content for direct user input/contact.
  9. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support for Russian and English.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.7.0, skrollr for parallax effects, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Snowplow for analytics. It uses a CMS platform likely Multiscreensite, with content delivery via static.cdn-website.com CDN. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses service workers for offline capabilities. Performance is moderate with prefetching of scripts and optimized image loading. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the site lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved with enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coralfinance.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coralfinance.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.