Skip to main content

Security report for coppa.nl

Coppa · Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Coppa is a Dutch consultancy firm specializing in procurement services for the healthcare and government sectors. Their business model focuses on helping clients professionalize, sustain, tender, outsource, and manage contracts to improve healthcare quality and affordability. The company has a long-standing domain since 1999, indicating established market presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and various Jet plugins, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism is implemented, though security headers and explicit privacy policies are missing. Overall, the site reflects a professional and trustworthy business but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coppa.nl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Coppa targets healthcare and government clients with procurement expertise, positioning itself as a specialized consultancy. Their key services include professionalizing procurement processes, sustainability initiatives, tendering, outsourcing, contract management, and interim solutions. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Google Analytics and maintains social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests room for growth in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The domain age and DNSSEC support reinforce legitimacy and trustworthiness in the market.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and DNSSEC, enhancing transport and DNS security. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes with detailed categories and Google reCAPTCHA cookies to mitigate spam. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance browser security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding visible contact information such as company email and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Coppa
Description
Met inkoop het verschil maken in de zorg voor mensen is wat ons drijft! Wij helpen opdrachtgevers binnen zorg en overheid met al hun inkoopvraagstukken. Van het professionaliseren, verduurzamen en aanbesteden tot totale uitbesteding, contractmanagement en interim inkoopoplossingen. Zo dragen wij ons steentje bij aan betere en betaalbaardere zorg voor iedereen.
Key services
Professionalizing procurement, Sustainability in procurement, Tendering, Total outsourcing, Contract management, Interim procurement solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Graphina Elementor Charts, CookieYes (cookie consent)
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • Google reCAPTCHA cookies present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with DNSSEC enabled
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage
  5. Social media links to LinkedIn and Instagram are present
  6. Website built on WordPress with Elementor and multiple Jet plugins
  7. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  9. No visible forms on the homepage to collect user data
  10. No security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and multiple Jet plugins, indicating a flexible and extensible infrastructure. The use of Yoast SEO and structured JSON-LD data supports good SEO practices. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and optimized images, but no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site is mobile optimized and uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons. JavaScript libraries include jQuery and various Elementor and Jet plugin scripts. Cookie consent is managed by CookieYes, integrating well with GDPR requirements. Technical risks are low, but the absence of security headers and incomplete privacy documentation represent technical debt and compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coppa.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coppa.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.