Skip to main content

Security report for copergreen.fr

Copergreen · Energy · France

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Copergreen is an independent pioneer group founded in 2008 specializing in the development and integration of photovoltaic energy projects. The company targets individuals and businesses interested in energy transition and solar power solutions, offering services such as project development, maintenance, optimization, and investment options. The website reflects a medium-sized energy sector business based in France, with consistent branding and professional content. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, hosted by OVH. It employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics for tracking and CookieYes for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No security policy or incident response information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. Cookie consent is well implemented with detailed categories and user controls, indicating good privacy compliance. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with basic privacy regulations. However, it could enhance its security posture by adding security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching copergreen.fr

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Copergreen holds a strong position as an independent photovoltaic project developer in France, leveraging a business model focused on energy transition services. Their competitive advantage lies in their pioneering status since 2008 and a comprehensive service offering that includes project integration, maintenance, and investment solutions. The company targets a broad customer base including farmers, business owners, and energy producers, supported by a clear partnership ecosystem visible through social media and external links. Growth indicators include active content updates and a professional digital presence. The absence of direct email contacts suggests a preference for phone and web form communications.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security governance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and third-party scripts are standard and reputable. Compliance with GDPR is supported by cookie consent but lacks a visible privacy policy. The site would benefit from formalizing its security posture through documented policies and enhanced technical controls to mitigate potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize a security policy and incident response contact to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Copergreen
Description
COPERGREEN est un groupe pionnier indépendant créé en 2008, spécialiste du développement de projets photovoltaïques.
Key services
Development of photovoltaic projects, Integration of photovoltaic systems, Maintenance, Optimization of production, Investment solutions (tiers investissement), Support for energy transition
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, CookieYes (cookie consent), jQuery, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
doubleclick.net
Tracking pixels
YouTube tracking cookies
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good SEO practices.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or main navigation.
  4. Contact information includes a phone number and contact form triggers but no direct email addresses visible.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies indicates active maintenance.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook and LinkedIn links.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. SSL is properly configured and enforced.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a mature and maintainable technical infrastructure. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable provider. The site uses Google Fonts, FontAwesome icons, and integrates Google Analytics via MonsterInsights plugin. Cookie consent is managed by CookieYes, providing detailed user controls. Performance is moderate with standard optimization; mobile responsiveness is good. Some technical debt is indicated by missing security headers and basic accessibility implementation. Overall, the technical setup supports business operations effectively but could be improved with enhanced security and accessibility measures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with copergreen.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review copergreen.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.