Skip to main content

Security report for cookiereports.com

Digital Control Room · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Digital Control Room is a UK-based company specializing in automated compliance and digital asset monitoring solutions tailored for the Pharma and Life Sciences sector. Their platform enables clients to discover and audit digital content across multiple brands and languages, helping reduce compliance risks and costly fines. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for global pharmaceutical companies, supported by client testimonials and industry awards such as The Kings Awards for Enterprise Innovation. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and comprehensive legal policies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, enhanced by the Breakdance theme and Yoast SEO plugin. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with cookie consent mechanisms in place. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and a security plugin is active, but the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data suggest areas for improvement. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adding security headers and publishing a formal security policy. The missing WHOIS registration data is a concern that should be addressed to improve trustworthiness. The site does not contain any adult or questionable content, targeting a professional audience in healthcare compliance. Strategic recommendations include improving security header implementation, verifying domain registration details, enhancing incident response documentation, and maintaining up-to-date technical components to ensure ongoing security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 27 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cookiereports.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Digital Control Room operates in a niche market providing compliance automation for Pharma and Life Sciences companies. Their competitive advantage lies in their ability to monitor distributed digital content globally with speed and accuracy, addressing a critical pain point in regulatory compliance. The business model appears to be B2B SaaS with professional services support. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and consulting. The company targets compliance officers, digital asset managers, and legal teams within pharmaceutical corporations. Growth indicators include client testimonials from top global pharma firms and industry recognition. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and legal transparency, supporting trust and credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. The use of a security plugin indicates proactive risk management. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The presence of a vulnerability disclosure page is positive but could be enhanced by adding a security.txt file. Incident response readiness appears moderate with a dedicated vulnerability response program. Overall, the security culture is professional but can be improved by formalizing policies and enhancing technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  3. Publish a formal security policy page detailing frameworks and controls in place.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve incident response.
  5. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Digital Control Room Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digital Control Room
Description
At Digital Control Room, discover automated compliance, monitor online content and reduce risk.
Key services
Automated compliance monitoring, Digital asset discovery, Content auditing, Risk reduction for online content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Breakdance WordPress theme/plugin, Yoast SEO plugin, CookieReports cookie consent
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugin (All In One WP Security and Firewall)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on Pharma and Life Sciences compliance automation
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent mechanisms
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  5. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or recent registration
  6. Contact information is clear and consistent with business domain
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The Breakdance theme and Yoast SEO plugin contribute to good SEO and responsive design. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are present and mobile optimization is good. The site uses cookie consent tools compliant with GDPR. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cookiereports.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cookiereports.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.