Skip to main content

Security report for conventum.lu

Conventum TPS · Finance · Luxembourg

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Conventum TPS is a Luxembourg-based fund management company specializing in third party fund governance and administrative services. Founded in 2001, it operates under the commercial name of BLI - Banque de Luxembourg Investments. The company targets professional investors and fund initiators, providing regulatory and operational support to enable clients to focus on asset management and client servicing. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and legal disclosures. Technically, the site is built on the Liferay CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and incident response information are absent. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the overall business credibility and website quality are high, supporting a positive risk assessment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 14 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conventum.lu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche in the Luxembourg financial sector, focusing on fund management and third party solutions. Its business model centers on providing governance, compliance, and administrative services to investment funds. The website links to related Banque de Luxembourg group sites, indicating partnership or affiliation. The target market is professional and institutional clients, with a small company size implied. The site content and navigation are well structured, supporting client engagement and information dissemination. No direct revenue streams or pricing models are disclosed on the homepage. The company maintains a LinkedIn presence, enhancing professional visibility. Overall, Conventum TPS appears to be a specialized, reputable player in the Luxembourg fund management ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent tool (tarteaucitron) to manage privacy compliance. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, and no incident response contacts are published. The absence of HTTP security headers reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Analytics are handled via Matomo with Do Not Track respected, indicating privacy-conscious tracking. The site lacks explicit security policies or certifications. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be improved by adding security headers, incident response info, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party libraries and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conventum TPS
Description
BLI - Banque de Luxembourg Investments, operating as Conventum Third Party Solutions, is a fund management company founded in 2001. They provide fund governance, regulatory and administrative services to fund initiators enabling them to focus on asset management and client service.
Key services
Fund governance, Regulatory compliance, Administrative services for investment funds
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Liferay CMS, jQuery 3.6.2, Swiper.js, Featherlight lightbox, Matomo Analytics, Tarteaucitron cookie consent
Frameworks
Liferay Portal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused cookie consent library (tarteaucitron)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to fund management services.
  3. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, limiting domain trust analysis.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  7. Contact information is clear and includes phone numbers, addresses, and a contact form.
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Liferay CMS platform, leveraging JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Swiper.js, and Featherlight for UI components. It uses Matomo for analytics and tarteaucitron for cookie consent management, reflecting a modern and privacy-aware technical stack. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with combined and minified resources served via a CDN. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. The site uses standard SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags but lacks JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and accessibility could enhance the overall technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conventum.lu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conventum.lu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.