Skip to main content

Security report for contimex.cz

Contimex spol. s r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Contimex spol. s r.o. is a Czech strategic advertising and digital agency operating since 1993, specializing in marketing strategies, digital marketing, creativity, production, and event organization. The company serves business clients seeking comprehensive marketing solutions and maintains a professional web presence with client testimonials and a clear team structure. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and CookieHub for cookie consent management, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though additional security headers and explicit privacy policies are absent. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and contact information suggest a trustworthy and established business. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching contimex.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention contimex.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
50%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for contimex.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Contimex positions itself as a long-standing player in the Czech marketing and advertising sector, leveraging strong client relationships and a diversified service portfolio including print, digital, and event marketing. The business model is agency-based, targeting corporate clients across various industries, with a focus on strategic and creative marketing solutions. The company demonstrates stable growth indicators through client testimonials and a broad client base. Partnerships with notable brands and a professional team structure support its market presence. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and formal privacy policies may affect trust among privacy-conscious clients. The company could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security and privacy documentation to strengthen its competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy and security standards. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible security.txt or incident response contact information, limiting the ability to report vulnerabilities. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and YouTube introduces potential privacy concerns, though cookie consent is managed via CookieHub. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with good foundational practices but lacking advanced protections and transparency. Enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy page detailing data processing and user rights.
  3. Establish and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Contimex spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Contimex spol. s r.o.
Description
Strategická reklamní a digitální agentura pomáhající klientům v reklamě a marketingu od roku 1993. Nabízí reklamní strategie, digitální marketing, kreativitu, produkci a organizaci eventů.
Key services
reklamní strategie, digitální marketing, kreativita, produkce, organizace eventů
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, CookieHub, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
YouTube
Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. No security.txt or incident response information available.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and YouTube tracking is disclosed.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Google Tag Manager and CookieHub for analytics and cookie management. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with appropriate meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the provided content. There is no indication of a CMS or specific backend platform from the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to improve load times. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and formal privacy documentation suggests areas for modernization and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with contimex.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review contimex.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.