Skip to main content

Security report for contentshift.de

CONTENTshift · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CONTENTshift operates as an accelerator program dedicated to fostering innovation and new business models within the content industry. The website positions itself as a niche player supporting startups and professionals in media and content sectors, offering accelerator programs, events, and networking opportunities. The business targets German-speaking markets with a focus on content industry stakeholders. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS, hosted by Anexia, and employs modern consent management via Cookiebot, alongside Matomo analytics for visitor insights. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but could benefit from additional security headers and regular audits of third-party scripts. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie declaration aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious WHOIS patterns were detected, and the domain registration is consistent with the business profile. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned within its market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching contentshift.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention contentshift.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
5
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for contentshift.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CONTENTshift's market positioning as a content industry accelerator provides a competitive advantage by focusing on a specialized sector. The business model revolves around supporting startups and content innovators through funding and mentorship programs. Revenue streams likely include program fees, partnerships, and sponsorships. The target customer segment includes startups, media companies, and content professionals seeking growth and innovation support. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable German industry organizations such as Boersenverein. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and ongoing accelerator rounds. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital presence and enhance accessibility to broaden reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent framework ensuring GDPR compliance. Use of Matomo analytics indicates a preference for privacy-respecting tools. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, which could be addressed to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security culture appears adequate for the business scale but could be strengthened with formal policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
  5. Expand contact information with verified phone numbers and physical addresses to increase business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CONTENTshift
Description
Der CONTENTshift-Accelerator ist das Förderprogramm für neue Geschäftsmodelle in der Content-Branche.
Key services
Accelerator program, Events, Networking, Support for startups
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Cookiebot, Matomo Analytics, Cloudflare
Frameworks
TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Matomo, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern cookie consent management via Cookiebot.
  2. Strong social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn.
  3. Comprehensive cookie declaration and GDPR compliance evident.
  4. No explicit terms of service found on main site.
  5. No direct phone numbers or physical addresses found in provided content.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Website content is professional and targeted at content industry startups and professionals.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a mature and flexible content management system suitable for enterprise and medium-sized businesses. Hosting is provided by Anexia, a reputable provider, with DNS configured across multiple nameservers for redundancy. The site uses Cookiebot for consent management and Matomo for analytics, reflecting a privacy-conscious technology stack. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The HTML is valid and SEO optimized with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal but include potential improvements in security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with contentshift.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review contentshift.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.