Skip to main content

Security report for constant-content.com

Constant Content · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Constant Content operates as a well-established content marketplace and custom content writing service provider, connecting businesses and brands with a network of freelance writers. The platform offers a wide range of content types including articles, product descriptions, blog posts, and whitepapers, serving a diverse clientele including large enterprises. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with strong trust indicators such as client testimonials from reputable companies and a large catalog of content offerings. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies and third-party analytics and marketing tools, hosted on a reliable CDN infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and secure form handling, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is supported by comprehensive privacy and terms pages, but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but does not outweigh the strong business signals present on the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching constant-content.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a scalable content solution provider with a marketplace model complemented by enterprise services and editorial support. Its business model relies on connecting freelance writers with buyers, offering both ready-made and custom content. The presence of testimonials from major clients and a large volume of marketplace articles indicates a mature and trusted platform. The parent company, Moresby Media Inc., suggests a corporate structure supporting the platform. The target audience includes businesses seeking content and freelance writers looking for opportunities. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its editorial oversight, scalability, and diverse content offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and secure AJAX-based login and signup forms, indicating a baseline security implementation. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggest areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate risks. Compliance with GDPR is implied by the privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could be a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate with recommendations to strengthen header policies and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Constant Content
Description
Constant Content is a content marketplace and writing services platform connecting brands and businesses with freelance writers to buy unique articles, marketing copy, product descriptions, blog posts, and more.
Key services
Pre-written article marketplace, Custom content writing, Enterprise content services, Freelance writer platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, jQuery, Bootstrap Icons, Cloudfront CDN, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by classes and icons)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL)
  • Login and signup forms use AJAX
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Optimize
Marketing tools
Mailchimp (email subscription form)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  3. Strong presence of client testimonials and trust signals.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  5. Privacy and terms pages are present and comprehensive.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  7. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  8. Use of multiple Google marketing and analytics tools.
  9. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual but not necessarily suspicious.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer, and jQuery, hosted on Amazon Cloudfront CDN for performance. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. The site uses AJAX for login and signup forms, enhancing user experience. Performance is moderate with potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable content marketplace.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with constant-content.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review constant-content.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.