Skip to main content

Security report for constancehotels.com

Constance Hotels & Resorts · Hospitality · Mauritius

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Constance Hotels & Resorts operates a professional and visually rich website showcasing luxury hospitality services across Indian Ocean destinations including Mauritius, Seychelles, Maldives, Madagascar, and Rodrigues. The brand targets affluent travelers seeking exclusive island experiences, offering accommodations, events, golf, spa, and wedding services. The website is built on modern technologies including Umbraco CMS, JavaScript libraries like Swiper and Flatpickr, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable gap, potentially due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces business credibility. Overall, the site is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with GDPR, supporting a high trustworthiness rating.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching constancehotels.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a premium luxury hospitality provider in the Indian Ocean region, leveraging unique island locations and curated experiences to differentiate from competitors. The business model focuses on direct bookings, loyalty programs, and event hosting to drive revenue. The website content and structure indicate a mature digital presence with consistent branding and comprehensive service offerings. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or registrar limitations, which is not uncommon but warrants further verification. The company appears to maintain a strong marketing and partnership ecosystem, utilizing modern tracking and consent tools to optimize user engagement and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy preferences. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contact information, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness. The site would benefit from publishing these details to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with formalized policies and communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS information to improve domain transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Constance Hotels & Resorts
Description
Official website of Constance Hotels & Resorts offering luxury hotels, resorts, and lodges in the Indian Ocean region including Mauritius, Seychelles, Maldives, Madagascar, and Rodrigues.
Key services
Luxury hotel accommodations, Resort stays, Island lodges, Event hosting, Golf courses, Spa and wellness, Gastronomy experiences, Wedding services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Swiper.js, Flatpickr, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Selfbook SDK, Mapbox GL JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent luxury hospitality messaging
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form used
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information found
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust but website content is professional
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Umbraco CMS, JavaScript libraries such as Swiper for UI components, Flatpickr for date picking, and Mapbox GL JS for interactive maps. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization and accessibility at a basic level. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially in loading multimedia content. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were observed. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience aligned with luxury hospitality branding.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with constancehotels.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review constancehotels.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.