Skip to main content

Security report for conseq.sk

Conseq Investment Management · Finance · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Conseq Investment Management operates as a reputable financial services company specializing in investment management products and services primarily targeting retail and qualified investors in Slovakia. The company offers a variety of investment programs including 3D Invest, Active Invest, and real estate funds, supported by a 17-year track record indicating market experience and stability. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its audience. Technically, the website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with Kentico CMS, integrating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Highcharts for interactive content. It employs Google Tag Manager for analytics and cookie-script.com for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features could be enhanced. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, includes standard security headers, and implements CSRF tokens and captchas on forms to mitigate common web threats. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not present, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, Conseq Investment Management's website demonstrates a solid security posture, good privacy compliance, and credible business representation. The site is safe for general audiences and aligns well with industry standards for financial services online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conseq.sk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Conseq Investment Management holds a strong position in the Slovak financial market with a focus on investment funds and wealth management. Its business model revolves around offering diversified investment products to both retail and qualified investors, leveraging long-term investment strategies such as the 3D Invest program. The company benefits from a well-established brand, a comprehensive product portfolio, and digital tools that facilitate client engagement and service delivery. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the public site suggests a controlled communication approach, likely channeling client interactions through secure portals and contact forms. The use of Kentico CMS and integration with Google services indicates a strategic investment in scalable and trackable digital marketing and client management infrastructure.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options), and secure form implementations including CSRF tokens and captchas. These measures reduce risks of common web attacks such as cross-site scripting, clickjacking, and automated abuse. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency but does not indicate immediate risk. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided scripts. Overall, the site follows best practices for a financial services website, though adding explicit security documentation and vulnerability disclosure policies would enhance trust and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security measures and user responsibilities.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate reporting of security issues.
  3. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider implementing a vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conseq Investment Management
Description
Conseq Investment Management is a financial services company offering investment management, including programs like 3D Invest, Active Invest, Classic Invest, and a platform for qualified investor funds. They provide investment products such as mutual funds and real estate funds, targeting retail and qualified investors.
Key services
3D Invest program, Active Invest, Classic Invest, PLATINiQ, Platform for qualified investor funds, Real estate investment funds
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Highcharts, Cookie Script
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token in forms
  • Captcha on contact and login forms
  • Secure login form with password field

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with proper security headers.
  2. Multiple investment products and services clearly described.
  3. Secure login area for clients with password and captcha.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present.
  5. Contact form includes captcha and privacy notice.
  6. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET WebForms framework with Kentico CMS, leveraging jQuery and Highcharts for dynamic content and data visualization. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking, complemented by a cookie consent script to comply with privacy regulations. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in resource optimization and accessibility. The technical stack is appropriate for the business domain but could benefit from modernization to newer frameworks for improved maintainability and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conseq.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conseq.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.