Skip to main content

Security report for conocophillips.com

ConocoPhillips · Energy · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ConocoPhillips is a leading global independent exploration and production company specializing in oil and gas. The company operates worldwide with a strong focus on responsible and reliable energy production. Their website reflects a mature enterprise with comprehensive investor relations, sustainability reporting, and global operational information. The digital infrastructure uses modern technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for privacy compliance, indicating a well-maintained and professional online presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, although explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally managed, but the lack of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that should be further investigated to confirm domain registration legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conocophillips.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ConocoPhillips holds a significant market position in the energy sector as an independent E&P company. Their business model focuses on exploration, production, and technology innovation in oil and gas, with additional services in commercial gas, power, and LNG licensing. The company targets investors, partners, and stakeholders globally, supported by a network of related domains for regional operations and vendor relations. The website content and structure support transparency and regulatory compliance, enhancing credibility. The company’s global footprint is evident through multiple country-specific domains and extensive sustainability and governance disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy and lack of explicit incident response contact details represent areas for improvement. The integration of OneTrust and Google Tag Manager shows attention to privacy and tracking controls. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from enhanced transparency around incident handling and vulnerability reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security incident response page with contact details to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Consider listing recognized security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001) to strengthen trust signals.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data visibility or verify domain registration details to eliminate concerns about domain legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ConocoPhillips
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ConocoPhillips
Description
A leading global exploration and production company, ConocoPhillips is uniquely equipped to deliver reliable, responsibly produced oil and gas.
Key services
Exploration and production, Innovation and technology, Commercial gas and power, Global LNG, LNG technology and licensing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API, Vimeo Player API, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive corporate information and investor relations content present.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust integration.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for a large corporation domain.
  6. Multiple external domains related to global operations and subsidiaries linked.
  7. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with consent mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and stable technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for cookie management. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conocophillips.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conocophillips.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.