Skip to main content

Security report for connatix.com

JWP Connatix · Media · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JWP Connatix operates as a video technology and monetization platform targeting broadcasters, publishers, and advertisers. The company offers services including live streaming, video on demand, advertising solutions, and audience engagement tools. Positioned as a trusted partner for top media brands, the business is newly founded in 2024 and headquartered in New York. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on media industry clients. Technically, the website is built on HubSpot CMS and leverages JW Player for video delivery. It integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, alongside a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, HTTPS is enabled with standard domain registrar protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published privacy or terms policies indicates room for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or WAF blocks were detected, suggesting a stable security posture but with potential compliance gaps. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good business credibility but requires enhancements in privacy disclosures and security best practices to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of connatix.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching connatix.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JWP Connatix targets the media sector with a focus on video content monetization and management. Its business model revolves around providing technology platforms for live and on-demand video, advertising integration, and audience engagement. The company appears to be in an early growth phase given the recent domain registration and founding year. The presence of structured data and marketing tools indicates a strategic approach to digital presence and customer acquisition. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the site may limit direct customer engagement but the physical address in New York supports legitimacy. The company’s partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data, suggesting a standalone operation or early stage. The use of HubSpot CMS and integration of major analytics and marketing platforms reflect a modern digital infrastructure. The business is positioned to serve broadcasters and publishers, likely generating revenue through platform subscriptions or advertising revenue shares. The website’s content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a credible market position.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and standard domain registrar protections, which are foundational security measures. The integration of OneTrust for cookie consent shows awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces the overall security robustness. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or present any blocking challenges, indicating normal accessibility. The lack of explicit privacy and terms policies is a compliance gap that should be addressed. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  5. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and customer support.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JWP Connatix
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JWP Connatix
Description
Monetize, manage, and scale video content with JWPC—trusted by top media brands for live, VOD, advertising, and audience engagement solutions.
Key services
live video streaming, video on demand (VOD), advertising solutions, audience engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JW Player, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, OneTrust Cookie Consent, HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HubSpot CMS with professional design and structured data.
  2. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage or metadata.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Physical address found in structured data indicating business presence in New York, USA.
  6. Uses JW Player technology for video delivery.
  7. Tracking via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel present.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  10. Domain is newly registered with standard registrar protections.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS and uses JW Player for video streaming, indicating a modern and scalable technology stack. Marketing and analytics integrations include Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, supporting data-driven decision making. The site is mobile optimized and uses web fonts (Lato, Overpass) for consistent branding. Performance is moderate with deferred CSS loading and asynchronous scripts. Hosting is via GoDaddy.com, LLC as per WHOIS data, with domain registration recent and domain status flags set to prevent unauthorized changes. The site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers. No CMS version or backend frameworks beyond HubSpot are explicitly detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and published compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +2Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 71/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with connatix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review connatix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.