Skip to main content

Security report for conexiant.com

Conexiant · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Conexiant is a well-established healthcare content and education platform, founded in 2001, positioning itself as a leading global destination for trusted clinical content and healthcare education. The website targets healthcare professionals and organizations, offering deep audience engagement and a broad education library. Technically, the site employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and advanced analytics tools such as Matomo, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, domain registration locked with multiple prohibitions, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot ensuring GDPR compliance. However, the site lacks explicit contact information, terms of service, and a published security policy, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of conexiant.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conexiant.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Conexiant operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on delivering clinical content and educational resources. Its business model revolves around content provision and audience engagement, likely monetized through partnerships and advertising. The domain age and registration details support a credible and mature business presence. The integration of multiple marketing and analytics platforms indicates a data-driven approach to user engagement and advertising effectiveness. Partnerships with healthcare-related domains and marketing service providers suggest a robust ecosystem supporting its operations. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage may indicate a focus on B2B or controlled access to support channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and domain registration secured against unauthorized changes. The use of cookie consent tools and compliance with GDPR reflects attention to privacy regulations. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used, but all appear to be managed with user consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and readiness perception. Enabling DNSSEC and publishing security-related policies would enhance trust and security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear terms of service page to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for support and security incidents.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact details to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize security risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conexiant
Description
The leading global healthcare destination that combines the most trusted clinical content, the deepest audience engagement, and the broadest education library.
Key services
Clinical content delivery, Audience engagement, Healthcare education library
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Bootstrap 5.1.1, Swiper 11, Matomo Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo Munchkin, Pushly SDK, AdRoll, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple client status prohibitions
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of reputable analytics and tracking with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo Munchkin
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll, DoubleClick (Google)
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo Munchkin, Pushly
Marketing tools
Marketo, BlueConic, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage content.
  4. Multiple reputable analytics and marketing tools integrated with consent.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. Strong domain age and registration security status.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. Website uses modern frontend technologies and frameworks.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is healthcare professional oriented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and robust technology stack with Bootstrap 5, jQuery, and Swiper for UI components, supported by Google Fonts and Material Icons for design consistency. Analytics and user behavior tracking are comprehensive, leveraging Matomo, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Analytics, all integrated with a consent management platform (Cookiebot). Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS and cookie data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and CDN usage. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site is mobile optimized and shows consistent branding. Technical risks are low but depend on ongoing management of third-party scripts and consent compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conexiant.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conexiant.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.